<div style="line-height:1.7;color:#000000;font-size:14px;font-family:Arial">Using ofproto/trace tracking, the feedback datapath port is correct, but the port that is forwarded in ovs-dpctl is wrong.<br><br><div><span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">ofproto/trace</span></div><div>Datapath actions: set(eth(src=00:00:00:00:00:00,dst=00:0b:82:a6:45:50)),set(ipv4(src=0.0.0.0/128.0.0.0,dst=192.168.1.129)),set(tcp(src=0,dst=8080)),<span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">1</span></div><pre>The datapath actions output to datapath port 1.</pre><div><span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">ovs-dpctl dump-flows</span></div><div><span style="font-family: arial; white-space: pre-wrap;">recirc_id(0),in_port(4),eth(src=78:02:f8:29:cb:58,dst=00:0b:82:92:21:db),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=192.168.1.64/255.255.255.192,dst=203.100.92.31,proto=6,frag=no),tcp(src=59765,dst=80), packets:4, bytes:296, used:3.980s, flags:S, actions:set(eth(src=78:02:f8:29:cb:58,dst=00:0b:82:a6:45:50)),set(ipv4(src=192.168.1.64/255.255.255.192,dst=192.168.1.129)),set(tcp(src=59765,dst=8080)),</span><span style="font-family: arial; white-space: pre-wrap; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">2</span></div><div><pre>The datapath actions output to datapath port 2.<br></pre></div><div style="position:relative;zoom:1"><br></div><div style="position:relative;zoom:1">Now can you understand what the problem is?</div><div style="position:relative;zoom:1"><br></div><div style="position:relative;zoom:1">--<br><div>--------</div><div>博学之,审问之,慎思之,明辨之,笃行之。</div><div>--------</div><div>Albert Xie</div><div style="clear:both"></div></div><div id="divNeteaseMailCard"></div><br><pre><br>At 2018-02-07 01:39:51, "Ben Pfaff" &lt;blp@ovn.org&gt; wrote:
&gt;I don't see the problem.  The datapath actions output to datapath port
&gt;1, which is br-lan0_zone0, e.g. LOCAL.
&gt;
&gt;On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 09:24:36AM +0800, a***** wrote:
&gt;&gt; ovs-appctl ofproto/trace br-lan0_zone0 "in_port=2,tcp,tp_dst=80" -generate
&gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; Bridge: br-lan0_zone0
&gt;&gt; Flow: tcp,in_port=2,vlan_tci=0x0000,dl_src=00:00:00:00:00:00,dl_dst=00:00:00:00:00:00,nw_src=0.0.0.0,nw_dst=0.0.0.0,nw_tos=0,nw_ecn=0,nw_ttl=0,tp_src=0,tp_dst=80,tcp_flags=0
&gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; Rule: table=0 cookie=0x1 priority=3,tcp,in_port=2,tp_dst=80
&gt;&gt; OpenFlow actions=learn(table=0,idle_timeout=60,hard_timeout=120,priority=100,in_port=LOCAL,NXM_OF_ETH_DST[]=NXM_OF_ETH_SRC[],eth_type=0x800,nw_proto=6,tcp_src=8080,NXM_OF_TCP_DST[]=NXM_OF_TCP_SRC[],load:NXM_OF_IP_DST[]-&gt;NXM_OF_IP_SRC[],load:NXM_OF_ETH_DST[]-&gt;NXM_OF_ETH_SRC[],load:NXM_OF_TCP_DST[]-&gt;NXM_OF_TCP_SRC[],output:NXM_OF_IN_PORT[]),mod_dl_dst:00:0b:82:a6:45:50,mod_nw_dst:192.168.1.129,mod_tp_dst:8080,LOCAL
&gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; Final flow: tcp,in_port=2,vlan_tci=0x0000,dl_src=00:00:00:00:00:00,dl_dst=00:0b:82:a6:45:50,nw_src=0.0.0.0,nw_dst=192.168.1.129,nw_tos=0,nw_ecn=0,nw_ttl=0,tp_src=0,tp_dst=8080,tcp_flags=0
&gt;&gt; Megaflow: recirc_id=0,tcp,in_port=2,dl_src=00:00:00:00:00:00,dl_dst=00:00:00:00:00:00,nw_src=0.0.0.0/1,nw_dst=0.0.0.0,nw_frag=no,tp_src=0,tp_dst=80
&gt;&gt; Datapath actions: set(eth(src=00:00:00:00:00:00,dst=00:0b:82:a6:45:50)),set(ipv4(src=0.0.0.0/128.0.0.0,dst=192.168.1.129)),set(tcp(src=0,dst=8080)),1
&gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; This problem is accidental, but the frequency is relatively high. I tracked this problem, but I could not know where the flow was modified.
&gt;&gt; I saw a problem in the OVS discussion group, about the mismatch of behavior when using lxia to test.(https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2017-April/044130.html)
&gt;&gt; It looks like a similar problem. I think there may be some logical errors inside the OVS. I believe that in your environment, as long as patient testing, it is easy to reappear.
&gt;&gt; Please take it seriously, and I want to know how this problem comes into being.
&gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; --
&gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; --------
&gt;&gt; 博学之,审问之,慎思之,明辨之,笃行之。
&gt;&gt; --------
&gt;&gt; Albert Xie
&gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; At 2018-02-06 01:04:16, "Ben Pfaff" &lt;blp@ovn.org&gt; wrote:
&gt;&gt; &gt;I suggest using ofproto/trace to figure it out.  See ovs-vswitchd(8) for
&gt;&gt; &gt;details.
&gt;&gt; &gt;
&gt;&gt; &gt;On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 07:42:10PM +0800, a***** wrote:
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; Hi,all
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; I recently found a bug about OVS, which was supposed to be sent to local but was sent to eth0!
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; Can you tell me why? I need help, thank you very much.
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; recirc_id(0),in_port(4),eth(src=78:02:f8:29:cb:58,dst=00:0b:82:92:21:db),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=192.168.1.64/255.255.255.192,dst=203.100.92.31,proto=6,frag=no),tcp(src=59765,dst=80), packets:4, bytes:296, used:3.980s, flags:S, actions:set(eth(src=78:02:f8:29:cb:58,dst=00:0b:82:a6:45:50)),set(ipv4(src=192.168.1.64/255.255.255.192,dst=192.168.1.129)),set(tcp(src=59765,dst=8080)),2
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; system@ovs-system:
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;         lookups: hit:4226 missed:543 lost:0
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;         flows: 14
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;         masks: hit:22261 total:8 hit/pkt:4.67
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;         port 0: ovs-system (internal)
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;         port 1: br-lan0_zone0 (internal)
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;         port 2: eth0
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;         port 3: ath0
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;         port 4: ath1
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; cookie=0x1, duration=444.585s, table=0, n_packets=1224, n_bytes=232770, idle_age=24, priority=3,tcp,in_port=2,tp_dst=80 actions=learn(table=0,idle_timeout=60,hard_timeout=120,priority=100,in_port=LOCAL,NXM_OF_ETH_DST[]=NXM_OF_ETH_SRC[],eth_type=0x800,nw_proto=6,tcp_src=8080,NXM_OF_TCP_DST[]=NXM_OF_TCP_SRC[],load:NXM_OF_IP_DST[]-&gt;NXM_OF_IP_SRC[],load:NXM_OF_ETH_DST[]-&gt;NXM_OF_ETH_SRC[],load:NXM_OF_TCP_DST[]-&gt;NXM_OF_TCP_SRC[],output:NXM_OF_IN_PORT[]),mod_dl_dst:00:0b:82:a6:45:50,mod_nw_dst:192.168.1.129,mod_tp_dst:8080,LOCAL
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; OFPT_FEATURES_REPLY (xid=0x2): dpid:0000000b82a64550
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; n_tables:254, n_buffers:256
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; capabilities: FLOW_STATS TABLE_STATS PORT_STATS QUEUE_STATS ARP_MATCH_IP
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; actions: output enqueue set_vlan_vid set_vlan_pcp strip_vlan mod_dl_src mod_dl_dst mod_nw_src mod_nw_dst mod_nw_tos mod_tp_src mod_tp_dst
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;  1(ath0): addr:00:0b:82:a6:45:51
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;      config:     0
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;      state:      0
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;      speed: 0 Mbps now, 0 Mbps max
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;  2(ath1): addr:00:0b:82:a6:45:52
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;      config:     0
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;      state:      0
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;      speed: 0 Mbps now, 0 Mbps max
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;  101(eth0): addr:00:0b:82:a6:45:50
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;      config:     0
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;      state:      0
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;      current:    COPPER AUTO_NEG
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;      advertised: 10MB-HD 10MB-FD 100MB-HD 100MB-FD 1GB-FD COPPER FIBER AUTO_NEG AUTO_PAUSE AUTO_PAUSE_ASYM
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;      speed: 0 Mbps now, 0 Mbps max
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;  LOCAL(br-lan0_zone0): addr:00:0b:82:a6:45:50
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;      config:     0
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;      state:      0
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;      speed: 0 Mbps now, 0 Mbps max
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; OFPT_GET_CONFIG_REPLY (xid=0x4): frags=normal miss_send_len=0
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; --
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; --------
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; 博学之,审问之,慎思之,明辨之,笃行之。
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; --------
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; Albert Xie
&gt;&gt; &gt;
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; _______________________________________________
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; discuss mailing list
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; discuss@openvswitch.org
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
</pre></div><br><br><span title="neteasefooter"><p>&nbsp;</p></span>