<div dir="ltr">Ok, I've just sent a patch and if you're not convinced we can<div>just do the 2x change. Thanks a lot!</div><div>Daniel</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:19 PM, Ben Pfaff <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:blp@ovn.org" target="_blank">blp@ovn.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I guess I wouldn't object.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 10:11:11PM +0100, Daniel Alvarez Sanchez wrote:<br>
> Thanks Ben and Mark. I'd be okay with 2x.<br>
> Don't you think that apart from that it can still be good to compact after<br>
> a<br>
> certain amount of time (like 1 day) if the number of transactions is > 0<br>
> regardless of the size?<br>
><br>
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Ben Pfaff <<a href="mailto:blp@ovn.org">blp@ovn.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> > It would be trivial to change 4x to 2x. 4x was just the suggestion in<br>
> > the Raft thesis. If 2x would make everyone a little more comfortable,<br>
> > let's make that change.<br>
> ><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>