[ovs-dev] [patch] Debian: make debian/copyright more friendly to the ftpmasters

Ben Pfaff blp at nicira.com
Mon Aug 23 19:08:24 UTC 2010


On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 02:52:18PM -0400, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Ben Pfaff <blp at nicira.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 06:34:36PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au>
> >
> > Thank you.  It looks about right, but I think that we need to
> > distinguish authors from copyright holders.  The @nicira.com email
> > addresses of authors, for example, correspond to Nicira Networks as
> > copyright holder, as opposed to the individual authors.  I'm not sure of
> > a good phrasing for this, do you have a suggestion?
> 
> Maybe we can do something generic like:
> 
> Copyright is retained by the respective authors or their assignees.
> 
> Ideally we could also either just reference the AUTHORS file or say
> that the author is the Open vSwitch project, without having to
> maintain a second copy of the list.
> 
> I don't know what Debian policy is on either of these.

Debian policy just says:

    Every package must be accompanied by a verbatim copy of its
    copyright information and distribution license in the file
    /usr/share/doc/package/copyright.

...

    Packages distributed under the Apache license (version 2.0), the
    Artistic license, the GNU GPL (versions 1, 2, or 3), the GNU LGPL
    (versions 2, 2.1, or 3), and the GNU FDL (versions 1.2 or 1.3)
    should refer to the corresponding files under
    /usr/share/common-licenses,[101] rather than quoting them in the
    copyright file.

It is customary, but not mandatory, to list authors who are not
copyright holders.

> The section about include/openvswitch specifies GPL v3 but it should be v2.

Thanks.




More information about the dev mailing list