[ovs-dev] [PATCH 4/9] vconn: Convert vconn code to modern OVS structure.
Ben Pfaff
blp at nicira.com
Wed Jan 6 22:29:17 UTC 2010
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 01:15:03PM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2009, at 1:15 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > - if (class->close || class->recv || class->send || class->wait) {
> > + if (class->close || class->recv || class->send
> > + || class->run || class->run_wait || class->wait) {
> > assert(class->close != NULL);
> > assert(class->recv != NULL);
> > assert(class->send != NULL);
> > + assert(class->run != NULL);
> > + assert(class->run_wait != NULL);
>
> This is the same question as I raised previously: is it guaranteed
> that "run" and "run_wait" are defined if any of them are? The
> comments above their description sounds as if they may be null.
Thanks again, I deleted these bad assertions here too.
More information about the dev
mailing list