[ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovs-ofctl: Improve usage message.

[Justin Pettit]

Looks good.

--Justin


On Nov 30, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:

> TARGET and SWITCH are different because TARGET can refer to a switch or a
> controller whereas SWITCH must be a switch, but TARGET wasn't defined
> before.
> 
> Also, TARGET seems a little more user-friendly than the VCONN that was used
> here before.
> 
> Reported-by: Reid Price <reid at nicira.com>
> Bug #7736.
> ---
> utilities/ovs-ofctl.c |    8 ++++----
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/utilities/ovs-ofctl.c b/utilities/ovs-ofctl.c
> index 7b2b186..cf77300 100644
> --- a/utilities/ovs-ofctl.c
> +++ b/utilities/ovs-ofctl.c
> @@ -187,10 +187,10 @@ usage(void)
>            "  replace-flows SWITCH FILE   replace flows with those in FILE\n"
>            "  monitor SWITCH [MISSLEN]    print packets received from SWITCH\n"
>            "\nFor OpenFlow switches and controllers:\n"
> -           "  probe VCONN                 probe whether VCONN is up\n"
> -           "  ping VCONN [N]              latency of N-byte echos\n"
> -           "  benchmark VCONN N COUNT     bandwidth of COUNT N-byte echos\n"
> -           "where each SWITCH is an active OpenFlow connection method.\n",
> +           "  probe TARGET                probe whether TARGET is up\n"
> +           "  ping TARGET [N]             latency of N-byte echos\n"
> +           "  benchmark TARGET N COUNT    bandwidth of COUNT N-byte echos\n"
> +           "where SWITCH or TARGET is an active OpenFlow connection method.\n",
>            program_name, program_name);
>     vconn_usage(true, false, false);
>     vlog_usage();
> -- 
> 1.7.2.5
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at openvswitch.org
> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev