[ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] python/ovs/pollar: use select.select instead of select.poll
Isaku Yamahata
yamahata at valinux.co.jp
Wed Sep 5 10:44:23 UTC 2012
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 11:04:52PM -0700, Reid Price wrote:
> Seems reasonable. Some notes inline, mostly nits and questions.
Thank you for review.
> +class _SelectSelect(object):
> + """ select.poll emulation by using select.select.
> + Only register and poll are needed at the moment.
> + """
> + def __init__(self):
>
>
>
>
> + super(_SelectSelect, self).__init__()
>
> This makes me think you are trying to something clever, when (I believe)
> you are not. Was there any particular reason to include it?
Looking at python/ovs, I found that it's the style not to call
super class __init__(). Ok, I'll follow the style.
> + self.rlist = []
> + self.wlist = []
> + self.xlist = []
> +
> + def register(self, fd, events):
> + if isinstance(fd, socket.socket):
> + fd = fd.fileno()
> + assert isinstance(fd, int)
> + if events & select.POLLIN:
> + self.rlist.append(fd)
>
>
>
>
> + events &= ~select.POLLIN
>
> I assume this is more typical to write it as this general form than as
> events -= select.POLLIN
> which is equivalent since you're already in the conditional
I think '&= ~' is a widely used idiom to drop a given bit.
--
yamahata
More information about the dev
mailing list