[ovs-dev] [threads 00/11] basic thread support library
blp at nicira.com
Wed Jun 19 21:54:11 UTC 2013
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 05:45:30PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote:
> On 19 June 2013 17:22, Ben Pfaff <blp at nicira.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 05:20:11PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote:
> >> On 19 June 2013 16:17, Ben Pfaff <blp at nicira.com> wrote:
> >> > This series has two purposes:
> >> >
> >> > * Add a basic thread support library to the tree.
> >> >
> >> > * Get rid of all calls to C library functions that POSIX describes
> >> > as inherently unsafe in a multithreaded program, and then add a
> >> > make-time check that flags an error if any calls get reintroduced.
> >> This fails to build on FreeBSD for me, because it appears to rely on
> >> header leakage for stdint.h types.
> >> In file included from lib/ovs-atomic.h:237,
> >> from lib/ovs-thread.h:23,
> >> from lib/command-line.c:22:
> >> lib/ovs-atomic-c11.h:26: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or
> >> '__attribute__' before 'uint8_t'
> > Does this mean that FreeBSD has <stdatomic.h>? Is it fully
> > functional? That's the one implementation I wasn't able to test,
> > because I didn't know of any C11 implementations with <stdatomic.h>.
> Indeed we do, and it should be functional. SVN history is here if
> you're interested:
> That said, it seems it wasn't stdint.h per se that was the problem; I
> needed to change:
> -typedef _Atomic uint8_t atomic_uint8_t;
> +typedef _Atomic(uint8_t) atomic_uint8_t;
Oh, that's odd. C11 appears to say that the parentheses are optional
with _Atomic in this case (you can use _Atomic(...) as a type
specifier or _Atomic by itself as a type qualifier) but I'll change it
since that fixes the problem.
More information about the dev