[ovs-dev] [PATCH] ofpbuf: Remove OFPBUF_STACK_BUFFER.

Ethan Jackson ethan at nicira.com
Fri Mar 1 19:02:36 UTC 2013


Acked-by: Ethan Jackson <ethan at nicira.com>



On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Andy Zhou <azhou at nicira.com> wrote:

> This looks good.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Ben Pfaff <blp at nicira.com> wrote:
>
>> Its alleged convenience just doesn't outweigh the syntactical ugliness,
>> and
>> so it didn't have any users.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <blp at nicira.com>
>> ---
>>  lib/ofpbuf.c |    6 +++---
>>  lib/ofpbuf.h |    6 +-----
>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/ofpbuf.c b/lib/ofpbuf.c
>> index fd10da3..c960a7e 100644
>> --- a/lib/ofpbuf.c
>> +++ b/lib/ofpbuf.c
>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>>  /*
>> - * Copyright (c) 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 Nicira, Inc.
>> + * Copyright (c) 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 Nicira, Inc.
>>   *
>>   * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
>>   * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
>> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ ofpbuf_use(struct ofpbuf *b, void *base, size_t
>> allocated)
>>   *
>>   * 'base' should be appropriately aligned.  Using an array of uint32_t or
>>   * uint64_t for the buffer is a reasonable way to ensure appropriate
>> alignment
>> - * for 32- or 64-bit data.  OFPBUF_STACK_BUFFER is a convenient way to
>> do so.
>> + * for 32- or 64-bit data.
>>   *
>>   * An ofpbuf operation that requires reallocating data will assert-fail
>> if this
>>   * function was used to initialize it.  Thus, one need not call
>> ofpbuf_uninit()
>> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ ofpbuf_use_stack(struct ofpbuf *b, void *base, size_t
>> allocated)
>>   *
>>   * 'base' should be appropriately aligned.  Using an array of uint32_t or
>>   * uint64_t for the buffer is a reasonable way to ensure appropriate
>> alignment
>> - * for 32- or 64-bit data.  OFPBUF_STACK_BUFFER is a convenient way to
>> do so.
>> + * for 32- or 64-bit data.
>>   *
>>   * An ofpbuf operation that requires reallocating data will copy the
>> provided
>>   * buffer into a malloc()'d buffer.  Thus, it is wise to call
>> ofpbuf_uninit()
>> diff --git a/lib/ofpbuf.h b/lib/ofpbuf.h
>> index bae3c0a..8b03c7e 100644
>> --- a/lib/ofpbuf.h
>> +++ b/lib/ofpbuf.h
>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>>  /*
>> - * Copyright (c) 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 Nicira, Inc.
>> + * Copyright (c) 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 Nicira, Inc.
>>   *
>>   * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
>>   * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
>> @@ -52,10 +52,6 @@ struct ofpbuf {
>>      void *private_p;            /* Private pointer for use by owner. */
>>  };
>>
>> -/* Declares NAME as a SIZE-byte array aligned properly for storing any
>> kind of
>> - * data.  For use with ofpbuf_use_stack(). */
>> -#define OFPBUF_STACK_BUFFER(NAME, SIZE) uint64_t NAME[DIV_ROUND_UP(SIZE,
>> 8)]
>> -
>>  void ofpbuf_use(struct ofpbuf *, void *, size_t);
>>  void ofpbuf_use_stack(struct ofpbuf *, void *, size_t);
>>  void ofpbuf_use_stub(struct ofpbuf *, void *, size_t);
>> --
>> 1.7.2.5
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev mailing list
>> dev at openvswitch.org
>> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at openvswitch.org
> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/attachments/20130301/481b0432/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the dev mailing list