[ovs-dev] Support for MCAST_Snooping

[Neethi Shashidhar]

Hi,

we have cloned the master branch,but the patch doesn't seem to be a part of
it and it works same as earlier. can you please explain how do we get it
using the list that you have sent.

Thanks,
Neethi
On 12-Dec-2014 6:27 pm, "Flavio Leitner" <fbl at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 02:46:50PM +0530, Neethi Shashidhar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > we are unable to find the patch against the master branch.can you tell us
> > how to get it?
>
> I sent to the list with copies to everyone in the thread.
> Here is the archive url:
> http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2014-December/049620.html
>
> fbl
>
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Neethi
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Aman Kumar <amank3107 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks Flavio,
> > >
> > > Tomorrow i will test it and once it will over i will inform you.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Aman Kumar
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Aman Kumar <amank3107 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > >> From: Flavio Leitner <fbl at redhat.com>
> > >> Date: Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:16 PM
> > >> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] Support for MCAST_Snooping
> > >> To: Aman Kumar <amank3107 at gmail.com>
> > >> Cc: gangadhar.singh at hp.com, Neethi Shashidhar <neethi209 at gmail.com>,
> > >> Gandharva S Murthy <gandharva666 at gmail.com>, "<dev at openvswitch.org>"
> <
> > >> dev at openvswitch.org>, Ben Pfaff <blp at nicira.com>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 08:41:34AM +0530, Aman Kumar wrote:
> > >> > Yes, Please do the patch against branch master and inform me, i will
> > >> test
> > >> > it with branch master.
> > >> > Currently i am using the branch master only.
> > >>
> > >> OK, I've done the patches and sent them as a new thread:
> > >> "[RFC 0/2] Add support to control Reports forwarding"
> > >>
> > >> It's pretty much *compile tested only* because my lack of
> > >> time for this, so please help me providing feedback.
> > >>
> > >> This is RFC because I am not happy with the vlan handling.
> > >> I think it should be per vlan, so instead of 'true'/'false',
> > >> it could be a list of vlans or 'trunk'.
> > >>
> > >> E.g.:
> > >> for specific vlans:
> > >> other_config:mcast-snooping-flood-reports="10,12,48"
> > >>
> > >> or for all vlans:
> > >> other_config:mcast-snooping-flood-reports="trunk"
> > >>
> > >> to be decided yet...
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> fbl
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
>