[ovs-dev] ppc build fixed/testsuite results

Flavio Leitner fbl at redhat.com
Mon Jan 13 09:50:31 UTC 2014


On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 04:53:18PM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> 
> > On Jan 9, 2014, at 4:40 PM, Flavio Leitner <fbl at redhat.com> wrote:
[...]
> > Regarding to testsuite, there is only one test failing now (branch
> > master), but I suspect that it's because I have a 32 bit _chroot_
> > on a ppc64 kernel because of the difference in the size of the
> > in_port's mask:
> > 
> > -skb_priority(0),skb_mark(0),in_port(1/0xffff),eth(src=50:54:00:00:00:09,dst=50:54:00:00:00:0a),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=10.0.0.2/255.255.255.255,dst=10.0.0.1/255.255.255.255,proto=1/0xff,tos=0/0xff,ttl=64/0xff,frag=no/0xfc),icmp(type=8,code=0),
> > packets:3, bytes:180, used:0.0s, actions:2
> > 
> > +skb_priority(0),skb_mark(0),in_port(1/0xffff0000),eth(src=50:54:00:00:00:09,dst=50:54:00:00:00:0a),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=10.0.0.2/255.255.255.255,dst=10.0.0.1/255.255.255.255,proto=1/0xff,tos=0/0xff,ttl=64/0xff,frag=no/0xfc),icmp(type=8,code=0),
> > packets:3, bytes:180, used:0.0s, actions:2
> > 
> > I did not investigate this further yet, but I appreciate if
> > you have any pointers
> 
> in_port mask seems to be in incorrect byte order, so you are bumping to this as no-one else is running big endian?

I didn't find anything wrong yet reviewing the code.
I will continue this when I have more time.

Thanks!
fbl
 



More information about the dev mailing list