[ovs-dev] [PATCH v5 5/6] ovn: Add "localnet" logical port type.

Ben Pfaff blp at nicira.com
Sat Aug 1 16:27:56 UTC 2015


On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 06:52:14AM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 08/01/2015 12:44 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:19:32PM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
> >> On 07/31/2015 07:26 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > Sorry, I forgot that there was a detailed example earlier.  I didn't
> > mean to make you go to a lot of work to repeat it.
> 
> No problem.  I copied it for the most part.  :-)
> 
> As you suggested, I'll incorporate it into the commit message, as well.

Thanks.

> > I am slightly concerned about having a pair of patch ports per provider
> > network port (that is what the above implies, right?), but let's go
> > ahead and try that and if it's a problem we can figure out an
> > optimization.
> 
> No, the repetition is only in the logical space.  There's only a single
> pair of patch ports per provider network.  In the above example, the
> input flow looks like this:
> 
>  cookie=0x0, duration=338.834s, table=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0,
> priority=100,in_port=1
> actions=set_field:0x1->reg5,set_field:0x2->metadata,set_field:0x4->reg6,resubmit(,16),set_field:0x3->metadata,set_field:0x6->reg6,resubmit(,16),set_field:0x1->metadata,set_field:0x2->reg6,resubmit(,16),set_field:0x4->metadata,set_field:0x8->reg6,resubmit(,16)
> 
> This seemed like a good stopping point to make sure I had everything
> right (I didn't ;-) ).  I still need to add VLAN support, which I was
> thinking would result in 1 patch port per VLAN.  So, there could be a
> lot more in that case.  I suppose I could try to do it all with flows,
> instead?

I guess it wouldn't be too hard, if we used a single trunk port rather
than VLAN access ports to join the two bridges.  But I'm also willing to
just do the simple thing, if access ports are simpler, and take a "wait
and see" attitude on whether the cost is too high somehow.



More information about the dev mailing list