[ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] ofproto-dpif-upcall: Use flow_wildcards_has_extra().

Jarno Rajahalme jrajahalme at nicira.com
Tue Sep 29 18:07:46 UTC 2015


Ben,

Will you review this, or should I just drop this?

  Jarno

> On Sep 18, 2015, at 5:44 PM, Jarno Rajahalme <jrajahalme at nicira.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Sep 18, 2015, at 3:01 PM, Ben Pfaff <blp at nicira.com <mailto:blp at nicira.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 04:54:21PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>>> Update the comment in ukey_revalidate() to reflect the fact that the
>>> mask in ukey is not the datapath mask, but the originally translated
>>> flow wildcards.
>>> 
>>> Use flow_wildcards_has_extra() instead of open coding equivalent (but
>>> different) functionality.  The old form and the code in
>>> flow_wildcards_has_extra() ((dp | wc != dp) and (dp & wc != wc),
>>> respecively) give the same result:
>>> 
>>> dp   wc    (dp | wc != dp)        (dp & wc != wc)
>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>> 0    0      (0 | 0 != 0) (false)   (0 & 0 != 0) (false)
>>> 0    1      (0 | 1 != 0) (true)    (0 & 1 != 1) (true)
>>> 1    0      (1 | 0 != 1) (false)   (1 & 0 != 0) (false)
>>> 1    1      (1 | 1 != 1) (false)   (1 & 1 != 1) (false)
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jrajahalme at nicira.com <mailto:jrajahalme at nicira.com>>
>> 
>> Does this change the behavior of the code at all; that is, is it a bug
>> fix?  I suspect not, but it'd be nice to know.
> 
> Just a refactor, no behavior change.
> 
>   Jarno
> 




More information about the dev mailing list