[ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 16/19] dpif-netdev: core_id shouldn't be negative.
Daniele Di Proietto
diproiettod at vmware.com
Sat Dec 3 02:14:15 UTC 2016
This doesn't fix any bug (AFAICT), it's just cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Di Proietto <diproiettod at vmware.com>
---
lib/dpif-netdev.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/dpif-netdev.c b/lib/dpif-netdev.c
index 626d921..a2373f0 100644
--- a/lib/dpif-netdev.c
+++ b/lib/dpif-netdev.c
@@ -278,10 +278,15 @@ enum pmd_cycles_counter_type {
#define XPS_TIMEOUT_MS 500LL
+#define RXQ_CORE_UNPINNED NON_PMD_CORE_ID
+
/* Contained by struct dp_netdev_port's 'rxqs' member. */
struct dp_netdev_rxq {
struct netdev_rxq *rxq;
- unsigned core_id; /* Сore to which this queue is pinned. */
+ unsigned core_id; /* Core to which this queue should be
+ pinned. RXQ_CORE_UNPINNED if the
+ queue doesn't need to be pinned to a
+ particular core. */
};
/* A port in a netdev-based datapath. */
@@ -1301,7 +1306,7 @@ port_create(const char *devname, const char *type,
devname, ovs_strerror(errno));
goto out_rxq_close;
}
- port->rxqs[i].core_id = -1;
+ port->rxqs[i].core_id = RXQ_CORE_UNPINNED;
n_open_rxqs++;
}
@@ -2745,7 +2750,7 @@ parse_affinity_list(const char *affinity_list, unsigned *core_ids, int n_rxq)
int error = 0;
for (i = 0; i < n_rxq; i++) {
- core_ids[i] = -1;
+ core_ids[i] = RXQ_CORE_UNPINNED;
}
if (!affinity_list) {
@@ -3670,7 +3675,7 @@ dp_netdev_add_port_rx_to_pmds(struct dp_netdev *dp,
for (i = 0; i < port->n_rxq; i++) {
if (pinned) {
- if (port->rxqs[i].core_id == -1) {
+ if (port->rxqs[i].core_id == RXQ_CORE_UNPINNED) {
continue;
}
pmd = dp_netdev_get_pmd(dp, port->rxqs[i].core_id);
@@ -3684,7 +3689,7 @@ dp_netdev_add_port_rx_to_pmds(struct dp_netdev *dp,
pmd->isolated = true;
dp_netdev_pmd_unref(pmd);
} else {
- if (port->rxqs[i].core_id != -1) {
+ if (port->rxqs[i].core_id != RXQ_CORE_UNPINNED) {
continue;
}
pmd = dp_netdev_less_loaded_pmd_on_numa(dp, numa_id);
--
2.10.2
More information about the dev
mailing list