[ovs-dev] [PATCH RFC v2] dpif-netdev: Allow different numbers of rx queues for different ports.

[Lajoie, Eric]

Good point.

I have multiple customer who are running OVS plus DPDK2.0 and they are waiting on OVS 2.5 to integrate DPDK 2.2 for Jumbo Frame support.

If they don’t have it soon they have mentioned moving to Snabb vswitch or other options like Nuage VRS or Contrails vRouter...

Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: Iezzi, Federico 
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 4:34 PM
To: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets at samsung.com>; dev at openvswitch.org; Ben Pfaff <blp at ovn.org>; Daniele Di Proietto <diproiettod at vmware.com>; Alex Wang <ee07b291 at gmail.com>; Joe Stringer <joestringer at nicira.com>; Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com>
Cc: Dyasly Sergey <s.dyasly at samsung.com>; Lajoie, Eric <eric.lajoie at hpe.com>; Bowden, Glyn <glyn.bowden at hpe.com>; O'Reilly, Darragh <darragh.oreilly at hpe.com>
Subject: RE: [ovs-dev] [PATCH RFC v2] dpif-netdev: Allow different numbers of rx queues for different ports.

DPDK and netdev could make OVS standard de-facto out there, there would not be a single product (open and close source) with these capabilities.
I believe that a lot of us would like to hear some reason.

Best Regards,
Federico

-----Original Message-----
From: Ilya Maximets [mailto:i.maximets at samsung.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 4:24 PM
To: Iezzi, Federico <federico.iezzi at hpe.com>; dev at openvswitch.org; Ben Pfaff <blp at ovn.org>; Daniele Di Proietto <diproiettod at vmware.com>; Alex Wang <ee07b291 at gmail.com>; Joe Stringer <joestringer at nicira.com>; Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com>
Cc: Dyasly Sergey <s.dyasly at samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH RFC v2] dpif-netdev: Allow different numbers of rx queues for different ports.

Hi,
It seems that just no one wants to review them. Even a bug fixes.
Last time my PMD related patch was reviewed in October, after a month and two pings.

Best regards, Ilya Maximets.

On 20.01.2016 17:48, Iezzi, Federico wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> It seems that a lot of DPDK and DPDK related patches are still in pending since before Christmas.
> Is there any problem with them?
> 
> Thanks,
> Federico
>