[ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH 02/14] Add NSH fields for Openvswitch flowkey

Ryan Moats rmoats at us.ibm.com
Tue Jun 14 17:13:28 UTC 2016


Jesse Gross <jesse at kernel.org> wrote on 06/14/2016 12:08:54 PM:

> From: Jesse Gross <jesse at kernel.org>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM at IBMUS
> Cc: Johnson Li <johnson.li at intel.com>, ovs dev <dev at openvswitch.org>
> Date: 06/14/2016 12:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH 02/14] Add NSH fields for
> Openvswitch flowkey
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Ryan Moats <rmoats at us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > "dev" <dev-bounces at openvswitch.org> wrote on 06/14/2016 11:34:50 AM:
> >
> >> From: Jesse Gross <jesse at kernel.org>
> >> To: Johnson Li <johnson.li at intel.com>
> >> Cc: ovs dev <dev at openvswitch.org>
> >> Date: 06/14/2016 11:35 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH 02/14] Add NSH fields for
> >> Openvswitch flow key
> >> Sent by: "dev" <dev-bounces at openvswitch.org>
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Johnson Li <johnson.li at intel.com>
wrote:
> >> > Openvswitch could use the fields of Network Serivce Header(NSH)
> >> > as key to steer traffic to the Virtual Network Functions(VNF).
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Johnson Li <johnson.li at intel.com>
> >>
> >> I only see patch 2/14. Are there supposed to be more?
> >
> > I took it to be a missing piece of the earlier patch set that had
> > a cover letter and then appeared to start at patch 3/14.
>
> Ah, that's a good point, thanks. I didn't even consider that this
> could have gotten stuck for a week.
>

Since I had 2/3rds of my latest incremental processing patch series just
"get lost" between the reflector and patchworks (and therefore require a
resubmit of those patches), I'm more sensitive to the possibility now :)



More information about the dev mailing list