[ovs-dev] [ovs-dev, v16, 1/5] Change encaps_run to work incrementally

Ryan Moats rmoats at us.ibm.com
Thu May 19 15:02:08 UTC 2016


Ben Pfaff <blp at ovn.org> wrote on 05/17/2016 10:13:19 PM:

> From: Ben Pfaff <blp at ovn.org>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM at IBMUS
> Cc: dev at openvswitch.org
> Date: 05/17/2016 10:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev,v16,1/5] Change encaps_run to work incrementally
>
> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 10:26:54AM -0500, Ryan Moats wrote:
> > As a side effect, tunnel context is persisted.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ryan Moats <rmoats at us.ibm.com>
>
> Thanks for updating this.

and thanks for looking - sorry for the delayed reply (I've been
doing OVN training the past couple of days)

> In a couple of places, this uses hmap_first_with_hash() to find an
> element in a hash table.  ovn-controller uses this method in some
> special cases where the hash value is known to be unique; for example, I
> think that it's used for a hash table where the "hash" is the assigned
> logical datapath ID, which is a unique 32-bit (maybe shorter? I don't
> recall at the moment) number.  But that trick doesn't work when the hash
> value is really a hash.  For example, it can't be used in this code
> where the hash is taken from a UUID, because there might be multiple
> UUIDs with the same hash value.  It's necessary, instead, to iterate
> through the items that have the desired hash value, with
> HMAP_FOR_EACH_WITH_HASH, and then compare the item's full key instead of
> just the hash.

Ugh - I thought I had changed that, but when I couple this with your
comments below, I'm thinking I've confused myself as to what patches
I have and haven't pushed

> In the process_full_encaps case, I don't see what removes tunnels that
> are no longer needed.
>
> This has some TODOs and commented-out code in it, so I suspect that it's
> not really ready for full review?

As I implied above, those shouldn't be there, so now I'm suspicious if I've
lost track of a ball that I've been juggling... Since I've got to rebase
the rest of the patches anyway, adding this one to the list won't add
that much additional effort...

Ryan




More information about the dev mailing list