[ovs-dev] [PATCH RFC 2/2] netdev-dpdk: Add vHost User PMD
Ilya Maximets
i.maximets at samsung.com
Fri Oct 21 12:11:34 UTC 2016
I'll post few comments to v4 here.
> static int
> +dpdk_attach_vhost_pmd(struct netdev_dpdk *dev, int mode)
> +{
> + char *devargs;
> + int err = 0;
> + uint8_t port_no = 0;
> + uint32_t driver_id = -1;
> +
> + if (id_pool_alloc_id(dpdk_get_vhost_id_pool(), &driver_id)) {
> + devargs = xasprintf("net_vhost%u,iface=%s,queues=%i,client=%i",
> + driver_id, dev->vhost_id,
> + MIN(OVS_VHOST_MAX_QUEUE_NUM, RTE_MAX_QUEUES_PER_PORT),
> + mode);
> + err = rte_eth_dev_attach(devargs, &port_no);
> + if (!err) {
> + dev->port_id = port_no;
> + dev->vhost_pmd_id = driver_id;
> + } else {
id should be freed on error.
> + VLOG_ERR("Failed to attach vhost-user device %s to DPDK",
> + dev->vhost_id);
> + }
> + } else {
> + VLOG_ERR("Unable to create vhost-user device %s - too many vhost-user"
> + "devices registered with PMD", dev->vhost_id);
> + err = ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + return err;
> +}
--------------
> static void
> netdev_dpdk_vhost_destruct(struct netdev *netdev)
> {
> struct netdev_dpdk *dev = netdev_dpdk_cast(netdev);
> - char *vhost_id;
>
> ovs_mutex_lock(&dpdk_mutex);
> ovs_mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
>
> - /* Guest becomes an orphan if still attached. */
> - if (netdev_dpdk_get_vid(dev) >= 0
> - && !(dev->vhost_driver_flags & RTE_VHOST_USER_CLIENT)) {
> - VLOG_ERR("Removing port '%s' while vhost device still attached.",
> - netdev->name);
> - VLOG_ERR("To restore connectivity after re-adding of port, VM on "
> - "socket '%s' must be restarted.", dev->vhost_id);
These log messages are useful. I think it's better to keep them somehow.
Maybe we can check for link status here?
> + if (rte_eth_dev_detach(dev->port_id, dev->vhost_id)) {
'rte_eth_dev_detach()' will call 'dpdk_vhost_driver_unregister()' and
this will lead to link status change if vhost still attached.
And as soon as 'dpdk_mutex' and 'dev->mutex' are taken, there will be deadlock
inside the callback.
See 3f891bbea61d ("netdev-dpdk: Fix deadlock in destroy_device().") for details.
The problem here is that we can't call 'rte_eth_dev_detach()' without 'dev->mutex'.
> + VLOG_ERR("Error removing vhost device %s", dev->vhost_id);
> + } else {
> + if (dev->type == DPDK_DEV_VHOST) {
"} else if {" ?
> + fatal_signal_remove_file_to_unlink(dev->vhost_id);
> + }
> }
> + id_pool_free_id(dpdk_get_vhost_id_pool(), dev->vhost_pmd_id);
I guess, that It's better to call 'free()' only if id was allocated.
>
> - free(ovsrcu_get_protected(struct ingress_policer *,
> - &dev->ingress_policer));
> -
> - rte_free(dev->tx_q);
> - ovs_list_remove(&dev->list_node);
> - dpdk_mp_put(dev->dpdk_mp);
> -
> - vhost_id = xstrdup(dev->vhost_id);
> + dpdk_destruct_helper(dev);
>
> ovs_mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
> ovs_mutex_unlock(&dpdk_mutex);
> -
> - if (dpdk_vhost_driver_unregister(dev, vhost_id)) {
> - VLOG_ERR("%s: Unable to unregister vhost driver for socket '%s'.\n",
> - netdev->name, vhost_id);
> - } else if (!(dev->vhost_driver_flags & RTE_VHOST_USER_CLIENT)) {
> - /* OVS server mode - remove this socket from list for deletion */
> - fatal_signal_remove_file_to_unlink(vhost_id);
> - }
> - free(vhost_id);
> }
Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
More information about the dev
mailing list