[ovs-dev] [PATCH V9 14/31] dpif-netlink: Use netdev flow put api to insert a flow
Roi Dayan
roid at mellanox.com
Tue Jun 6 13:53:27 UTC 2017
On 02/06/2017 23:08, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 02:59:56PM +0300, Roi Dayan wrote:
>> From: Paul Blakey <paulb at mellanox.com>
>>
>> Using the new netdev flow api operate will now try and
>> offload flows to the relevant netdev of the input port.
>> Other operate methods flows will come in later patches.
>>
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/lib/dpif-netlink.c b/lib/dpif-netlink.c
>> index 6f36b5e..8438e71 100644
>> --- a/lib/dpif-netlink.c
>> +++ b/lib/dpif-netlink.c
> [...]
>
>> static void
>> -dpif_netlink_operate(struct dpif *dpif_, struct dpif_op **ops, size_t n_ops)
>> +dbg_print_flow(const struct nlattr *key, size_t key_len,
>> + const struct nlattr *mask, size_t mask_len,
>> + const struct nlattr *actions, size_t actions_len,
>> + const ovs_u128 *ufid,
>> + const char *op)
>> +{
>
>
> perhaps:
> if (VLOG_IS_DBG_ENABLED()) {
>
>> + struct ds s;
>> +
>> + ds_init(&s);
>> + ds_put_cstr(&s, op);
>> + ds_put_cstr(&s, " (");
>> + odp_format_ufid(ufid, &s);
>> + ds_put_cstr(&s, ")");
>> + if (key_len) {
>> + ds_put_cstr(&s, "\nflow (verbose): ");
>> + odp_flow_format(key, key_len, mask, mask_len, NULL, &s, true);
>> + ds_put_cstr(&s, "\nflow: ");
>> + odp_flow_format(key, key_len, mask, mask_len, NULL, &s, false);
>> + }
>> + ds_put_cstr(&s, "\nactions: ");
>> + format_odp_actions(&s, actions, actions_len);
>> + VLOG_DBG("\n%s", ds_cstr(&s));
>> + ds_destroy(&s);
> }
>
> to avoid those operations on every flow put?
> or maybe on the caller to avoid the function call.
>
right. maybe not an important change? in a later commit we remove
this function and refactor log_flow_put_message() from dpif.c and
use that. "dpif-netlink: Use dpif logging functions"
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +try_send_to_netdev(struct dpif_netlink *dpif, struct dpif_op *op)
>> {
>> - struct dpif_netlink *dpif = dpif_netlink_cast(dpif_);
>> + int err = EOPNOTSUPP;
>>
>> + switch (op->type) {
>> + case DPIF_OP_FLOW_PUT: {
>> + struct dpif_flow_put *put = &op->u.flow_put;
>> +
>> + if (!put->ufid) {
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + dbg_print_flow(put->key, put->key_len, put->mask, put->mask_len,
>> + put->actions, put->actions_len, put->ufid,
>> + (put->flags & DPIF_FP_MODIFY ? "PUT(MODIFY)" : "PUT"));
>> + err = parse_flow_put(dpif, put);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + case DPIF_OP_FLOW_DEL:
>> + case DPIF_OP_FLOW_GET:
>> + case DPIF_OP_EXECUTE:
>> + default:
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return err;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void
>> +dpif_netlink_operate_chunks(struct dpif_netlink *dpif, struct dpif_op **ops,
>> + size_t n_ops)
>> +{
>> while (n_ops > 0) {
>> size_t chunk = dpif_netlink_operate__(dpif, ops, n_ops);
>> +
>> ops += chunk;
>> n_ops -= chunk;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +static void
>> +dpif_netlink_operate(struct dpif *dpif_, struct dpif_op **ops, size_t n_ops)
>> +{
>> + struct dpif_netlink *dpif = dpif_netlink_cast(dpif_);
>> + struct dpif_op *new_ops[OPERATE_MAX_OPS];
>> + int count = 0;
>> + int i = 0;
>> + int err = 0;
>> +
>> + if (netdev_is_flow_api_enabled()) {
>> + while (n_ops > 0) {
>> + count = 0;
>> +
>> + while (n_ops > 0 && count < OPERATE_MAX_OPS) {
>> + struct dpif_op *op = ops[i++];
>> +
>> + err = try_send_to_netdev(dpif, op);
>> + if (err && err != EEXIST) {
>> + new_ops[count++] = op;
>> + } else {
>> + op->error = err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + n_ops--;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dpif_netlink_operate_chunks(dpif, new_ops, count);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dpif_netlink_operate_chunks(dpif, ops, n_ops);
>> +}
>> +
>
> The above could be:
>
> if (netdev_is_flow_api_enabled()) {
> ...
> } else {
> dpif_netlink_operate_chunks(dpif, ops, n_ops);
> }
>
> return;
> }
>
>
> Otherwise the patch looks good to me.
>
ok
More information about the dev
mailing list