[ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] netflow: Fix memory leak in netflow_unref.
Greg Rose
gvrose8192 at gmail.com
Mon May 22 14:40:04 UTC 2017
On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 12:55 +0800, Yunjian Wang wrote:
> The memory leak was triggered each time on calling netflow_unref() with
> containing netflow_flows. And flows need to be removed and destroyed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian at huawei.com>
> ---
> ofproto/netflow.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/ofproto/netflow.c b/ofproto/netflow.c
> index 55f7814..29c5f3e 100644
> --- a/ofproto/netflow.c
> +++ b/ofproto/netflow.c
> @@ -409,10 +409,17 @@ netflow_ref(const struct netflow *nf_)
> void
> netflow_unref(struct netflow *nf)
> {
> + struct netflow_flow *nf_flow, *next;
> +
> if (nf && ovs_refcount_unref_relaxed(&nf->ref_cnt) == 1) {
> atomic_count_dec(&netflow_count);
> collectors_destroy(nf->collectors);
> ofpbuf_uninit(&nf->packet);
> + HMAP_FOR_EACH_SAFE (nf_flow, next, hmap_node, &nf->flows) {
> + hmap_remove(&nf->flows, &nf_flow->hmap_node);
> + free(nf_flow);
> + }
> + hmap_destroy(&nf->flows);
> free(nf);
> }
> }
This looks right to me. The only other place I see the flows freed is
when they're detected as idle. If the flow is never detected as idle
then I don't see anywhere else that they are freed up after the xzalloc
in netflow_flow_update().
Reviewed-by: Greg Rose <gvrose8192 at gmail.com>
More information about the dev
mailing list