[ovs-dev] [PATCH] rhel.rst: Add python-sphinx as a dependency.

Ben Pfaff blp at ovn.org
Wed Nov 8 20:18:36 UTC 2017


On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:31:48PM -0200, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Nov 2017 13:21:22 -0400
> Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Guru Shetty <guru at ovn.org> writes:
> > 
> > > On 31 October 2017 at 13:06, Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >  Ben Pfaff <blp at ovn.org> writes:
> > >  
> > >  > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 03:47:35PM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:  
> > >  >> Ben Pfaff <blp at ovn.org> writes:
> > >  >>  
> > >  >> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:39:10AM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:  
> > >  >> >> Signed-off-by: Gurucharan Shetty <guru at ovn.org>
> > >  >> >> ---
> > >  >> >>  Documentation/intro/install/rhel.rst | 2 +-
> > >  >> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >  >> >>
> > >  >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/intro/install/rhel.rst b/Documentation/intro/install/rhel.rst
> > >  >> >> index 86c5cf3..aff6ccf 100644
> > >  >> >> --- a/Documentation/intro/install/rhel.rst
> > >  >> >> +++ b/Documentation/intro/install/rhel.rst
> > >  >> >> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ the below command::
> > >  >> >>
> > >  >> >>      $ yum install gcc make python-devel openssl-devel kernel-devel graphviz \
> > >  >> >>          kernel-debug-devel autoconf automake rpm-build redhat-rpm-config \
> > >  >> >> -        libtool checkpolicy selinux-policy-devel
> > >  >> >> +        libtool checkpolicy selinux-policy-devel python-sphinx  
> > >  >> >
> > >  >> > For Debian, we just recommend installing the build-dependencies listed
> > >  >> > in debian/control.  That has the advantage that it can't get out of
> > >  >> > date.  It has the disadvantage, though, that it's not easy to cut and
> > >  >> > paste (although "apt-get build-dep openvswitch" usually does the trick).
> > >  >> > Maybe "yum" has some mode that installs dependencies from a spec file?  
> > >  >>
> > >  >> For 'yum' distributions:
> > >  >>
> > >  >>   yum-builddep
> > >  >>
> > >  >> For 'dnf' distributions (newer Fedora, and future RHEL versions):
> > >  >>
> > >  >>   dnf builddep  
> > >  >
> > >  > Would it be reasonable to change rhel.rst to recommend using one of
> > >  > those tools, to ease future maintenance?  
> > >
> > >  Sure.  Something like below?  I don't know about the wordsmithing, so
> > >  I'll defer that to Guru.
> > >
> > >  ---
> > >
> > >  diff --git a/Documentation/intro/install/rhel.rst b/Documentation/intro/install/
> > >  rhel.rst
> > >  index 86c5cf3..36bb661 100644
> > >  --- a/Documentation/intro/install/rhel.rst
> > >  +++ b/Documentation/intro/install/rhel.rst
> > >  @@ -72,11 +72,14 @@ Build Requirements
> > >
> > >   To compile the RPMs, you will need to install the packages described in the
> > >   :doc:`general` along with some additional packages. These can be installed with
> > >  -the below command::
> > >  +the below command for ``yum`` based distributions (but note that the
> > >  +openvswitch source RPM must be available somewhere)::
> > >
> > > Expecting source rpm while building the rpm, looks like is not going to happen for majority of the
> > > cases. I took it that we will need it if "yum-builddep openvswitch" needs to succeed?.  
> > 
> > I didn't think about.  As I understand, `yum-builddep` requires the
> > source RPM.  That means we would need to build the SRPM (rpmbuild -bs)
> > first.
> 
> You can use both tools with the spec file:
> [fleitner at plex ovs]$ sudo yum-builddep rhel/openvswitch-fedora.spec

Hey, that seems about perfect.  Can we recommend using that?


More information about the dev mailing list