[ovs-dev] DNS support feature (was: Re: DNS support options)
mmichels at redhat.com
Thu Oct 26 19:10:54 UTC 2017
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 4:16 PM Yifeng Sun <pkusunyifeng at gmail.com> wrote:
> I feel that unbound stands out in the available open source DNS resolver.
> Below is the summary for unbound:
> * The actual resolving work is done by a background process or thread. A
> background process or thread seems unavoidable. Linux's getaddrinfo_a
> clones a thread similarly.
* It is ported on Linux, BSD, Windows, MacOS/X and Solaris/SPARC. This is
> good because OVS runs on a large range of platforms.
* It complies to the standard, with optional DNSSEC support. Some of its
> features may not be needed in our case.
> * The unbound context is thread-safe. Its internal locks may bring some
> overhead. But since the DNS resolving is not frequent in OVS, I suppose
> this small overhead is not an issue.
> Unbound looks like a good option. Another option is to create a background
> thread which processes DNS resolving requests from the main thread and
> sends back the resulting events to the main thread. This method is quite
> simple and straightforward.
> The above are what I got so far. Please give your thoughts, thanks a lot.
If portability to all of the systems you mentioned in your second bullet
point is important, then you can rule out a couple of options:
* getaddrinfo_a is a GNU extension and is only available with glibc
* The resolver functions are a BSD specification so they'd be available
on most platforms, but not on Windows. I don't personally recommend these
because of the need to manually parse the DNS responses you receive.
That leaves two options:
* Run a background thread uses getaddrinfo() to perform resolution.
* Use a third-party library (like unbound).
Of these two options, I feel like the third-party library is the better
option. The only downside I can think of is the extra dependency for OVS.
And as far as what third-party library to use, I was the one that suggested
unbound in the first place, so obviously I'm fine with using it :)
> Below is the link for original discussion:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Ben Pfaff <blp at ovn.org> wrote:
>> Hello everyone, please allow me to introduce Yifeng Sun (CCed), who
>> recently joined VMware's Open vSwitch team. I've asked Yifeng to start
>> out by working on DNS support for Open vSwitch. Yifeng, can you tell us
>> about what you've discovered so far, based on this thread from August
>> that I'm reviving, and your tentative conclusions?
More information about the dev