[ovs-dev] 答复: [RFC] Question about ovn-controller performance

[Numan Siddique]

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 4:16 PM, <wang.qianyu at zte.com.cn> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Whether we could add a port property to logical flow? port property have
> value of "normal" or logical port name. If the port property is "normal"
> means this logical flow should be allocated to all HVs, if port property
> is a name of logical_port, means this logical flow is related to specific
> port, not need allocated to all computer nodes.
>
> I think this manner may reduce a great mount of flows in single HV.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 王前宇10110202
> 2017/09/14 10:39
>
>         收件人：        azhou at ovn.org, blp at ovn.org, zhouhan at gmail.com,
>         抄送：  dev at openvswitch.org, XuRong037997/user/zte_ltd at zte_ltd,
> ZhouHuiJing033341/user/zte_ltd at zte_ltd
>         主题：  [ovs-dev] [RFC] Question about ovn-controller performance
>
> I configure 5 networks, every network have about 80 ports, the total ports
> is 400, all in same security group.
>
>
Can you please clear the remote group match on the security group rules (if
remote group is configured) and see the cpu usage of ovn-controllers?
Even we noticed similar behavior.

Thanks
Numan


When I bind some port on HVs, the ovn-controller is always running with
> 100% cpu, and the total openflow table entities in ovs is more than
> 300,000. Most of the entities is table 52, worked as src ip filter.
>
> Could some one tell me how to reduce the flows or how to make
> ovn-controller work more efficient or do some options to reduce the table
> number of acls?
>
> The attachment is the dump of ovn-sb.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at openvswitch.org
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
>
>