[ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] openvswitch: Trim off padding before L3+ netfilter processing

Pravin Shelar pshelar at ovn.org
Wed Jan 3 06:21:17 UTC 2018


On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Ed Swierk <eswierk at skyportsystems.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Pravin Shelar <pshelar at ovn.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 7:17 AM, Ed Swierk <eswierk at skyportsystems.com> wrote:
>>> IPv4 and IPv6 packets may arrive with lower-layer padding that is not
>>> included in the L3 length. For example, a short IPv4 packet may have
>>> up to 6 bytes of padding following the IP payload when received on an
>>> Ethernet device. In the normal IPv4 receive path, ip_rcv() trims the
>>> packet to ip_hdr->tot_len before invoking netfilter hooks (including
>>> conntrack and nat).
>>>
>>> In the IPv6 receive path, ip6_rcv() does the same using
>>> ipv6_hdr->payload_len. Similarly in the br_netfilter receive path,
>>> br_validate_ipv4() and br_validate_ipv6() trim the packet to the L3
>>> length before invoking NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING hooks.
>>>
>>> In the OVS conntrack receive path, ovs_ct_execute() pulls the skb to
>>> the L3 header but does not trim it to the L3 length before calling
>>> nf_conntrack_in(NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING). When nf_conntrack_proto_tcp
>>> encounters a packet with lower-layer padding, nf_checksum() fails and
>>> logs "nf_ct_tcp: bad TCP checksum". While extra zero bytes don't
>>> affect the checksum, the length in the IP pseudoheader does. That
>>> length is based on skb->len, and without trimming, it doesn't match
>>> the length the sender used when computing the checksum.
>>>
>>> The assumption throughout nf_conntrack and nf_nat is that skb->len
>>> reflects the length of the L3 header and payload, so there is no need
>>> to refer back to ip_hdr->tot_len or ipv6_hdr->payload_len.
>>>
>>> This change brings OVS into line with other netfilter users, trimming
>>> IPv4 and IPv6 packets prior to L3+ netfilter processing.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ed Swierk <eswierk at skyportsystems.com>
>>> ---
>>> v2:
>>> - Trim packet in nat receive path as well as conntrack
>>> - Free skb on error
>>> ---
>>>  net/openvswitch/conntrack.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
>>> index b27c5c6..1bdc78f 100644
>>> --- a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
>>> +++ b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
>>> @@ -703,6 +703,33 @@ static bool skb_nfct_cached(struct net *net,
>>>         return ct_executed;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +/* Trim the skb to the L3 length. Assumes the skb is already pulled to
>>> + * the L3 header. The skb is freed on error.
>>> + */
>>> +static int skb_trim_l3(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>> +{
>>> +       unsigned int nh_len;
>>> +       int err;
>>> +
>>> +       switch (skb->protocol) {
>>> +       case htons(ETH_P_IP):
>>> +               nh_len = ntohs(ip_hdr(skb)->tot_len);
>>> +               break;
>>> +       case htons(ETH_P_IPV6):
>>> +               nh_len = ntohs(ipv6_hdr(skb)->payload_len)
>>> +                       + sizeof(struct ipv6hdr);
>>> +               break;
>>> +       default:
>>> +               nh_len = skb->len;
>>> +       }
>>> +
>>> +       err = pskb_trim_rcsum(skb, nh_len);
>>> +       if (err)
>> This should is unlikely.
>
> I'll add unlikely().
>
>>> +               kfree_skb(skb);
>>> +
>>> +       return err;
>>> +}
>>> +
>> This looks like a generic function, it probably does not belong to OVS
>> code base.
>
> Indeed. I'll move it to skbuff.c, unless you have a better idea.
>
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_NF_NAT_NEEDED
>>>  /* Modelled after nf_nat_ipv[46]_fn().
>>>   * range is only used for new, uninitialized NAT state.
>>> @@ -715,8 +742,12 @@ static int ovs_ct_nat_execute(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nf_conn *ct,
>>>  {
>>>         int hooknum, nh_off, err = NF_ACCEPT;
>>>
>>> +       /* The nat module expects to be working at L3. */
>>>         nh_off = skb_network_offset(skb);
>>>         skb_pull_rcsum(skb, nh_off);
>>> +       err = skb_trim_l3(skb);
>>> +       if (err)
>>> +               return err;
>>>
>> ct-nat is executed within ct action, so I do not see why you you call
>> skb-trim again from ovs_ct_nat_execute().
>> ovs_ct_execute() trim should take care of the skb.
>
> I see. Doesn't that mean that skb_pull_rcsum() is also unnecessary in
> ovs_ct_nat_execute(), as ovs_ct_execute() has already pulled the skb
> to the L3 header?
>

Yes, It looks redundant. but lets address it in separate patch.


More information about the dev mailing list