[ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] ovndb-servers: Set connection table when using

aginwala aginwala at asu.edu
Mon Jul 9 18:04:12 UTC 2018


Hi Ben:

I guess the cherry pick failed because of the dependency patch. Can you
port https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/925566/ to branch-2.9 as its
pre-req for these patches and apply above two on top of that. It would work
that way. Let me know further.



Regards,


On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 11:26 AM Ben Pfaff <blp at ovn.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 01:29:52AM +0530, Numan Siddique wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 7:03 AM, aginwala <amginwal at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > load balancer to manage ovndb clusters via pacemaker.
> > >
> > > This is will allow setting inactivity probe on the master node.
> > > For pacemaker to manage ovndb resources via LB, we skipped creating
> > > connection
> > > table and hence the inactivity probe was getting set to 5000 by
> default.
> > > In order to over-ride it we need this table. However, we need to skip
> > > slaves
> > > listening on local sb and nb connections table so that LB feature is
> > > intact and only master is listening on 0.0.0.0
> > >
> > > e.g --remote=db:OVN_Southbound,SB_Global,connections and
> > >     --remote=db:OVN_Northbound,NB_Global,connections
> > >
> > > will be skipped for slave SB and NB dbs respectively by unsetting
> > > --db-sb-use-remote-in-db  and --db-nb-use-remote-in-db in ovn-ctl.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: aginwala <aginwala at ebay.com>
> > >
> >
> > Acked-by: Numan Siddique <nusiddiq at redhat.com>
>
> I applied this to master on the strength of the acks.  I don't know
> enough about pacemaker to review it myself, so I just applied it
> verbatim.
>
> I think there was a request for a branch-2.9 backport, but the
> cherry-pick failed so I'll need assistance (probably a branch-2.9 post
> of the patches).
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at openvswitch.org
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
>


More information about the dev mailing list