[ovs-dev] OVS DPDK: dpdk_merge pull request for master

Stokes, Ian ian.stokes at intel.com
Tue Jul 24 16:58:20 UTC 2018


> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:30:08PM +0000, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:25:26AM +0000, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> > > > > On 20/07/2018 16:56, Ian Stokes wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Ben,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The following changes since commit
> > > > > > 3c921cc2b6b760bd0db73fd629ee9614edc8914c:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >    build: Add gitattribute file to build-aux (2018-07-19
> > > > > > 21:02:33
> > > > > > +0300)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > are available in the git repository at:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >    https://github.com/istokes/ovs dpdk_merge
> > > > > >
> > > > > > for you to fetch changes up to
> > > 0e0e9e213f13be508d282ffefd7bbe8c680e4fc8:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >    sparse: Add support for DPDK. (2018-07-20 15:44:45 +0100)
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Ian,
> > > > >
> > > > > After some discussions with Darrell around patch 8/14 of the
> > > > > "Support multi-segment mbufs​" patchset, I'll be sending a v6 of
> > > > > that series with that patch removed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Could that be included in this PR (meaning the previously
> > > > > included
> > > > > v5 of the series would be dropped entirely), since it still
> > > > > hasn't been merged to master?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks, and sorry for the trouble here.
> > > >
> > > > No problem, it makes more sense for a new pull request, otherwise
> > > > there
> > > would be a revert for patch 8. If you send out a v6 with the
> > > required patch removed and any other changes (which are small I
> > > would think) I can review and apply to a new pull request.
> > >
> > > Ian, would you mind just appending the changes to your current PR so
> > > that I can pull the whole thing in one go?
> >
> > Sure, I've sent a new pull request that have all the changes ready and
> rebased to head of master just now.
> >
> > https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2018-July/350005.html
> 
> Oh, and can you confirm that you'd like this to be merged into master
> before I branch for 2.10 (which will probably happen today)?
> 

Yes, this is targeted for 2.10 as well, if you can merge to master before branch that would be great.

Ian
> Thanks,
> 
> Ben.


More information about the dev mailing list