[ovs-dev] Automated robotic reply. Re: ...

[Justin Pettit]

> On Jun 20, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> 0-day Robot <robot at bytheb.org> writes:
> 
>> Bleep bloop.  Greetings Justin Pettit, I am a robot and I have tried out your patch
>> with message ID  <1529454160-88413-1-git-send-email-jpettit at ovn.org>
>> Thanks for your contribution.
>> 
>> I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting.  See the details below.
>> 
>> 
>> checkpatch:
>> == Checking "0000.patch" ==
>> ERROR: Too many signoffs; are you missing Co-authored-by lines?
>> Lines checked: 118, Warnings: 0, Errors: 1
> 
> I'll fix the sign off check in checkpatch.  It shouldn't flag on these
> kinds of patches.
> 
> Sorry for the noise.

No problem.  Thanks for setting it up.  I agree that it shouldn't flag on this issue, however, the bigger concern I have is that the warning seems to be separated from the file names, which is a bit confusing.  And, I imagine it would be very confusing if someone had multiple patches flagged, since it wouldn't be clear which error list applied to which patch.

--Justin