[ovs-dev] Automated robotic reply. Re: ...

[Justin Pettit]

> On Jun 20, 2018, at 8:47 AM, Ben Pfaff <blp at ovn.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 08:20:19AM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
>> 
>>> On Jun 20, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 0-day Robot <robot at bytheb.org> writes:
>>> 
>>>> Bleep bloop.  Greetings Justin Pettit, I am a robot and I have tried out your patch
>>>> with message ID  <1529454160-88413-1-git-send-email-jpettit at ovn.org>
>>>> Thanks for your contribution.
>>>> 
>>>> I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting.  See the details below.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> checkpatch:
>>>> == Checking "0000.patch" ==
>>>> ERROR: Too many signoffs; are you missing Co-authored-by lines?
>>>> Lines checked: 118, Warnings: 0, Errors: 1
>>> 
>>> I'll fix the sign off check in checkpatch.  It shouldn't flag on these
>>> kinds of patches.
>>> 
>>> Sorry for the noise.
>> 
>> No problem.  Thanks for setting it up.  I agree that it shouldn't flag
>> on this issue, however, the bigger concern I have is that the warning
>> seems to be separated from the file names, which is a bit confusing.
>> And, I imagine it would be very confusing if someone had multiple
>> patches flagged, since it wouldn't be clear which error list applied
>> to which patch.
> 
> What file names?  Sign-offs aren't associated with files.

Sorry, I meant patch name. 

—Justin