[ovs-dev] [PATCH v10 05/14] dp-packet: Fix data_len handling multi-seg mbufs.
Flavio Leitner
fbl at sysclose.org
Wed Oct 3 18:26:16 UTC 2018
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 05:15:06PM +0100, Tiago Lam wrote:
> When a dp_packet is from a DPDK source, and it contains multi-segment
> mbufs, the data_len is not equal to the packet size, pkt_len. Instead,
> the data_len of each mbuf in the chain should be considered while
> distributing the new (provided) size.
>
> To account for the above dp_packet_set_size() has been changed so that,
> in the multi-segment mbufs case, only the data_len on the last mbuf of
> the chain and the total size of the packet, pkt_len, are changed. The
> data_len on the intermediate mbufs preceeding the last mbuf is not
> changed by dp_packet_set_size(). Furthermore, in some cases
> dp_packet_set_size() may be used to set a smaller size than the current
> packet size, thus effectively trimming the end of the packet. In the
> multi-segment mbufs case this may lead to lingering mbufs that may need
> freeing.
>
> __dp_packet_set_data() now also updates an mbufs' data_len after setting
> the data offset. This is so that both fields are always in sync for each
> mbuf in a chain.
I think we need an assert(source) to make sure dp_packet_shift() will
never be called for a multi-seg.
> Co-authored-by: Michael Qiu <qiudayu at chinac.com>
> Co-authored-by: Mark Kavanagh <mark.b.kavanagh at intel.com>
> Co-authored-by: Przemyslaw Lal <przemyslawx.lal at intel.com>
> Co-authored-by: Marcin Ksiadz <mksiadz at gmail.com>
> Co-authored-by: Yuanhan Liu <yliu at fridaylinux.org>
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Qiu <qiudayu at chinac.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Kavanagh <mark.b.kavanagh at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Lal <przemyslawx.lal at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marcin Ksiadz <mksiadz at gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yliu at fridaylinux.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tiago Lam <tiago.lam at intel.com>
> Acked-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro at redhat.com>
> ---
> lib/dp-packet.h | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/dp-packet.h b/lib/dp-packet.h
> index 6376039..4545041 100644
> --- a/lib/dp-packet.h
> +++ b/lib/dp-packet.h
> @@ -426,20 +426,60 @@ dp_packet_size(const struct dp_packet *b)
> return b->mbuf.pkt_len;
> }
>
> +/* Sets the size of the packet 'b' to 'v'. For non-DPDK packets this only means
> + * setting b->size_, but if used in a DPDK packet it means adjusting the first
> + * mbuf pkt_len and last mbuf data_len, to reflect the real size, which can
> + * lead to free'ing tail mbufs that are no longer used.
> + *
> + * This function should be used for setting the size only, and if there's an
> + * assumption that the tail end of 'b' will be trimmed. For adjustng the head
> + * 'end' of 'b', dp_packet_pull() should be used instead. */
> static inline void
> dp_packet_set_size(struct dp_packet *b, uint32_t v)
> {
> - /* netdev-dpdk does not currently support segmentation; consequently, for
> - * all intents and purposes, 'data_len' (16 bit) and 'pkt_len' (32 bit) may
> - * be used interchangably.
> - *
> - * On the datapath, it is expected that the size of packets
> - * (and thus 'v') will always be <= UINT16_MAX; this means that there is no
> - * loss of accuracy in assigning 'v' to 'data_len'.
> - */
> - b->mbuf.data_len = (uint16_t)v; /* Current seg length. */
> - b->mbuf.pkt_len = v; /* Total length of all segments linked to
> - * this segment. */
> + if (b->source == DPBUF_DPDK) {
> + struct rte_mbuf *mbuf = &b->mbuf;
> + uint16_t new_len = v;
> + uint16_t data_len;
> + uint16_t nb_segs = 0;
> + uint16_t pkt_len = 0;
> +
> + /* Trim 'v' length bytes from the end of the chained buffers, freeing
> + any buffers that may be left floating */
> + while (mbuf) {
> + data_len = MIN(new_len, mbuf->data_len);
> + mbuf->data_len = data_len;
> +
> + if (new_len - data_len <= 0) {
> + /* Free the rest of chained mbufs */
> + free_dpdk_buf(CONTAINER_OF(mbuf->next, struct dp_packet,
> + mbuf));
> + mbuf->next = NULL;
> + } else if (!mbuf->next) {
> + /* Don't assign more than what we have available */
> + mbuf->data_len = MIN(new_len,
> + mbuf->buf_len - mbuf->data_off);
> + }
> +
> + new_len -= data_len;
> + nb_segs += 1;
> + pkt_len += mbuf->data_len;
> + mbuf = mbuf->next;
> + }
> +
> + /* pkt_len != v would effectively mean that pkt_len < than 'v' (as
> + * being bigger is logically impossible). Being < than 'v' would mean
> + * the 'v' provided was bigger than the available room, which is the
> + * responsibility of the caller to make sure there is enough room */
> + ovs_assert(pkt_len == v);
> +
> + b->mbuf.nb_segs = nb_segs;
> + b->mbuf.pkt_len = pkt_len;
> + } else {
> + b->mbuf.data_len = v;
> + /* Total length of all segments linked to this segment. */
> + b->mbuf.pkt_len = v;
> + }
> }
>
> static inline uint16_t
> @@ -451,7 +491,27 @@ __packet_data(const struct dp_packet *b)
> static inline void
> __packet_set_data(struct dp_packet *b, uint16_t v)
> {
> - b->mbuf.data_off = v;
> + if (b->source == DPBUF_DPDK) {
> + /* Moving data_off away from the first mbuf in the chain is not a
> + * possibility using DPBUF_DPDK dp_packets */
> + ovs_assert(v == UINT16_MAX || v <= b->mbuf.buf_len);
> +
> + uint16_t prev_ofs = b->mbuf.data_off;
> + b->mbuf.data_off = v;
> + int16_t ofs_diff = prev_ofs - b->mbuf.data_off;
> +
> + /* When dealing with DPDK mbufs, keep data_off and data_len in sync.
> + * Thus, update data_len if the length changes with the move of
> + * data_off. However, if data_len is 0, there's no data to move and
> + * data_len should remain 0. */
> +
> + if (b->mbuf.data_len != 0) {
> + b->mbuf.data_len = MIN(b->mbuf.data_len + ofs_diff,
> + b->mbuf.buf_len - b->mbuf.data_off);
if 'v' is <= mbuf.buf_len, then why we need the above?
Why not b->mbuf.data_len += ofs_diff ?
fbl
> + }
> + } else {
> + b->mbuf.data_off = v;
> + }
> }
>
> static inline uint16_t
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at openvswitch.org
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
--
Flavio
More information about the dev
mailing list