[ovs-dev] [PATCH] datapath: Use correct reply values in datapath and vport ops

Yifeng Sun pkusunyifeng at gmail.com
Wed Oct 17 19:25:47 UTC 2018


This patch fixes the bug that all datapath and vport ops are returning
wrong values (OVS_FLOW_CMD_NEW or OVS_DP_CMD_NEW) in their replies.

This commit backports upstream net-next's commit 804fe108fc92e59
("openvswitch: Use correct reply values in datapath and vport ops").

Signed-off-by: Yifeng Sun <pkusunyifeng at gmail.com>
Acked-by: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar at ovn.org>
---
 datapath/datapath.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/datapath/datapath.c b/datapath/datapath.c
index a8d09fb415d4..3f1cdb0316a0 100644
--- a/datapath/datapath.c
+++ b/datapath/datapath.c
@@ -1196,14 +1196,14 @@ static int ovs_flow_cmd_set(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 						       ovs_header->dp_ifindex,
 						       reply, info->snd_portid,
 						       info->snd_seq, 0,
-						       OVS_FLOW_CMD_NEW,
+						       OVS_FLOW_CMD_SET,
 						       ufid_flags);
 			BUG_ON(error < 0);
 		}
 	} else {
 		/* Could not alloc without acts before locking. */
 		reply = ovs_flow_cmd_build_info(flow, ovs_header->dp_ifindex,
-						info, OVS_FLOW_CMD_NEW, false,
+						info, OVS_FLOW_CMD_SET, false,
 						ufid_flags);
 
 		if (unlikely(IS_ERR(reply))) {
@@ -1279,7 +1279,7 @@ static int ovs_flow_cmd_get(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 	}
 
 	reply = ovs_flow_cmd_build_info(flow, ovs_header->dp_ifindex, info,
-					OVS_FLOW_CMD_NEW, true, ufid_flags);
+					OVS_FLOW_CMD_GET, true, ufid_flags);
 	if (IS_ERR(reply)) {
 		err = PTR_ERR(reply);
 		goto unlock;
@@ -1405,7 +1405,7 @@ static int ovs_flow_cmd_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 		if (ovs_flow_cmd_fill_info(flow, ovs_header->dp_ifindex, skb,
 					   NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).portid,
 					   cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq, NLM_F_MULTI,
-					   OVS_FLOW_CMD_NEW, ufid_flags) < 0)
+					   OVS_FLOW_CMD_GET, ufid_flags) < 0)
 			break;
 
 		cb->args[0] = bucket;
@@ -1744,7 +1744,7 @@ static int ovs_dp_cmd_set(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 	ovs_dp_change(dp, info->attrs);
 
 	err = ovs_dp_cmd_fill_info(dp, reply, info->snd_portid,
-				   info->snd_seq, 0, OVS_DP_CMD_NEW);
+				   info->snd_seq, 0, OVS_DP_CMD_GET);
 	BUG_ON(err < 0);
 
 	ovs_unlock();
@@ -1775,7 +1775,7 @@ static int ovs_dp_cmd_get(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 		goto err_unlock_free;
 	}
 	err = ovs_dp_cmd_fill_info(dp, reply, info->snd_portid,
-				   info->snd_seq, 0, OVS_DP_CMD_NEW);
+				   info->snd_seq, 0, OVS_DP_CMD_GET);
 	BUG_ON(err < 0);
 	ovs_unlock();
 
@@ -1799,7 +1799,7 @@ static int ovs_dp_cmd_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 		if (i >= skip &&
 		    ovs_dp_cmd_fill_info(dp, skb, NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).portid,
 					 cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq, NLM_F_MULTI,
-					 OVS_DP_CMD_NEW) < 0)
+					 OVS_DP_CMD_GET) < 0)
 			break;
 		i++;
 	}
@@ -2116,7 +2116,7 @@ static int ovs_vport_cmd_set(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 
 	err = ovs_vport_cmd_fill_info(vport, reply, genl_info_net(info),
 				      info->snd_portid, info->snd_seq, 0,
-				      OVS_VPORT_CMD_NEW);
+				      OVS_VPORT_CMD_SET);
 	BUG_ON(err < 0);
 	ovs_unlock();
 
@@ -2198,7 +2198,7 @@ static int ovs_vport_cmd_get(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 		goto exit_unlock_free;
 	err = ovs_vport_cmd_fill_info(vport, reply, genl_info_net(info),
 				      info->snd_portid, info->snd_seq, 0,
-				      OVS_VPORT_CMD_NEW);
+				      OVS_VPORT_CMD_GET);
 	BUG_ON(err < 0);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
@@ -2234,7 +2234,7 @@ static int ovs_vport_cmd_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 						    NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).portid,
 						    cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq,
 						    NLM_F_MULTI,
-						    OVS_VPORT_CMD_NEW) < 0)
+						    OVS_VPORT_CMD_GET) < 0)
 				goto out;
 
 			j++;
-- 
2.7.4



More information about the dev mailing list