[ovs-dev] [PATCH net-next] net: openvswitch: use netif_ovs_is_port() instead of opencode

[Taehee Yoo]

Use netif_ovs_is_port() function instead of open code.
This patch doesn't change logic.

Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073 at gmail.com>
---
 net/openvswitch/dp_notify.c    | 2 +-
 net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/openvswitch/dp_notify.c b/net/openvswitch/dp_notify.c
index 53cf07d141b4..7af0cde8b293 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/dp_notify.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/dp_notify.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ void ovs_dp_notify_wq(struct work_struct *work)
 				if (vport->ops->type == OVS_VPORT_TYPE_INTERNAL)
 					continue;
 
-				if (!(vport->dev->priv_flags & IFF_OVS_DATAPATH))
+				if (!(netif_is_ovs_port(vport->dev)))
 					dp_detach_port_notify(vport);
 			}
 		}
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c b/net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c
index 52a1ed9633ec..57d6436e6f6a 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ void ovs_netdev_detach_dev(struct vport *vport)
 static void netdev_destroy(struct vport *vport)
 {
 	rtnl_lock();
-	if (vport->dev->priv_flags & IFF_OVS_DATAPATH)
+	if (netif_is_ovs_port(vport->dev))
 		ovs_netdev_detach_dev(vport);
 	rtnl_unlock();
 
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static void netdev_destroy(struct vport *vport)
 void ovs_netdev_tunnel_destroy(struct vport *vport)
 {
 	rtnl_lock();
-	if (vport->dev->priv_flags & IFF_OVS_DATAPATH)
+	if (netif_is_ovs_port(vport->dev))
 		ovs_netdev_detach_dev(vport);
 
 	/* We can be invoked by both explicit vport deletion and
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ovs_netdev_tunnel_destroy);
 /* Returns null if this device is not attached to a datapath. */
 struct vport *ovs_netdev_get_vport(struct net_device *dev)
 {
-	if (likely(dev->priv_flags & IFF_OVS_DATAPATH))
+	if (likely(netif_is_ovs_port(dev)))
 		return (struct vport *)
 			rcu_dereference_rtnl(dev->rx_handler_data);
 	else
-- 
2.17.1