[ovs-dev] Forcing inlining for igb_uio and kni

[David Marchand]

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:31 AM Ilya Maximets <i.maximets at samsung.com>
wrote:

> On 11.06.2019 11:45, David Marchand wrote:
> > I noticed that OVS CI [1] patches the dpdk sources to force some
> inlining parameters and get kni and igb_uio to build fine.
> >
> > Looking at it in dpdk, meson support dropped this.
> > In the makefiles, I can't find a reason in the git history (we go back
> to 1.3.0rX version).
> >
> > [dmarchan at dmarchan dpdk]$ git grep max-inline-insns-single
> > kernel/linux/igb_uio/Makefile:MODULE_CFLAGS += -I$(SRCDIR) --param
> max-inline-insns-single=100
> > kernel/linux/kni/Makefile:MODULE_CFLAGS += -I$(SRCDIR) --param
> max-inline-insns-single=50
> > [dmarchan at dmarchan dpdk]$ git blame origin/master --
> kernel/linux/igb_uio/Makefile |grep max-inline-insns-single
> > 13dc56a6 lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/igb_uio/Makefile (Intel
>  2012-12-20 00:00:00 +0100 15) MODULE_CFLAGS += -I$(SRCDIR) --param
> max-inline-insns-single=100
> > [dmarchan at dmarchan dpdk]$ git blame origin/master --
> kernel/linux/kni/Makefile |grep max-inline-insns-single
> > 3fc5ca2f lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/Makefile (Intel
>  2012-12-20 00:00:00 +0100 14) MODULE_CFLAGS += -I$(SRCDIR) --param
> max-inline-insns-single=50
> >
> > Is there a valid reason to keep this?
> > 1:
> https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/.travis/linux-build.sh#L81
> <
> https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=b7de159c45b1fa79.b7df9ed3-c4806461f28ecaf5&u=https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/.travis/linux-build.sh#L81
> >
>
> Hi, David.
> I don't know the reason for these in OVS travis config, But we don't
> need to know them, actually. I have a patch to drop all the kernel
> related stuff from the DPDK build in OVS Travis checks, just didn't
> send it yet. Will send soon, probably.
>

I had this in mind since we don't need those kmods in the CI.
Thanks Ilya.


The question on dpdk side remains open :-).

-- 
David Marchand