[ovs-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] netdev-offload: Rename offload providers.
Ilya Maximets
i.maximets at samsung.com
Thu May 16 06:26:32 UTC 2019
On 15.05.2019 23:32, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com> writes:
>
>> Ilya Maximets <i.maximets at samsung.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 15.05.2019 19:13, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>>> Hi Aaron.
>>>>
>>>> Robot complains about lines not touched by this patch.
>>>> This is strange.
>>>
>>> I suspect that it's because of file renaming.
>>
>> Yes, I think you're correct.
>>
>>> What git version you're using? Or maybe some special options?
>>
>> I don't think it matters the version (I just tried locally with my git
>> 2.19.1). I think when the diff is being generated via git for
>> processing (the robot doesn't patch file directly, it uses checkpatch.py
>> -1), it includes all of old file as '-' and all of the new file as '+',
>> so the robot will see it.
>>
>> I get a similar checkpatch complaint just doing a git mv on the file and
>> trying to commit, because I have checkpatch setup as a commit hook.
>
> I'll re-work the robot to do the git-am and then run against the
> original patch file. That will suppress these kinds of issues.
This will probably help.
However, I don't see any issues while using "checkpatch.py -1".
On my Ubuntu:
$ ./utilities/checkpatch.py -1
== Checking 6921c382c9fd ("netdev-offload: Rename offload providers.") ==
Lines checked: 263, no obvious problems found
$ git --version
git version 2.17.1
And on my FreeBSD VM:
# ./utilities/checkpatch.py -1
== Checking 6a7b77036f3c ("netdev-offload: Rename offload providers.") ==
Lines checked: 263, no obvious problems found
# git --version
git version 2.20.1
Also, this patch is exactly same in all previous versions since v2.
And there was no complains for them.
>
>>>> Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
>>>>
>>>> On 15.05.2019 19:05, 0-day Robot wrote:
>>>>> Bleep bloop. Greetings Ilya Maximets, I am a robot and I have tried out your patch.
>>>>> Thanks for your contribution.
>>>>>
>>>>> I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> checkpatch:
>>>>> ERROR: Improper whitespace around control block
>>>>> #1065 FILE: lib/netdev-offload-tc.c:173:
>>>>> HMAP_FOR_EACH_WITH_HASH(data, ufid_node, ufid_hash, &ufid_tc) {
>>>>>
>>>>> ERROR: Improper whitespace around control block
>>>>> #1135 FILE: lib/netdev-offload-tc.c:243:
>>>>> HMAP_FOR_EACH_WITH_HASH(data, ufid_node, ufid_hash, &ufid_tc) {
>>>>>
>>>>> ERROR: Improper whitespace around control block
>>>>> #1165 FILE: lib/netdev-offload-tc.c:273:
>>>>> HMAP_FOR_EACH_WITH_HASH(data, tc_node, tc_hash, &ufid_tc) {
>>>>>
>>>>> ERROR: Improper whitespace around control block
>>>>> #1209 FILE: lib/netdev-offload-tc.c:317:
>>>>> HMAP_FOR_EACH_WITH_HASH(data, node, hash, &prios) {
>>>>>
>>>>> WARNING: Line is 80 characters long (recommended limit is 79)
>>>>> #1471 FILE: lib/netdev-offload-tc.c:579:
>>>>> match_set_nw_src_masked(match, key->ipv4.ipv4_src, mask->ipv4.ipv4_src);
>>>>>
>>>>> WARNING: Line is 80 characters long (recommended limit is 79)
>>>>> #1472 FILE: lib/netdev-offload-tc.c:580:
>>>>> match_set_nw_dst_masked(match, key->ipv4.ipv4_dst, mask->ipv4.ipv4_dst);
>>>>>
>>>>> WARNING: Line is 82 characters long (recommended limit is 79)
>>>>> #1545 FILE: lib/netdev-offload-tc.c:653:
>>>>> size_t set_offset = nl_msg_start_nested(buf, OVS_ACTION_ATTR_SET);
>>>>>
>>>>> WARNING: Line is 83 characters long (recommended limit is 79)
>>>>> #1550 FILE: lib/netdev-offload-tc.c:658:
>>>>> nl_msg_put_be64(buf, OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_ID, action->encap.id);
>>>>>
>>>>> WARNING: Line is 81 characters long (recommended limit is 79)
>>>>> #1600 FILE: lib/netdev-offload-tc.c:708:
>>>>> nl_msg_put_u32(buf, OVS_ACTION_ATTR_OUTPUT, odp_to_u32(outport));
>>>>>
>>>>> WARNING: Line is 84 characters long (recommended limit is 79)
>>>>> #1618 FILE: lib/netdev-offload-tc.c:726:
>>>>> || (flower->offloaded_state == TC_OFFLOADED_STATE_UNDEFINED);
>>>>>
>>>>> ERROR: Improper whitespace around control block
>>>>> #1756 FILE: lib/netdev-offload-tc.c:864:
>>>>> NL_ATTR_FOR_EACH_UNSAFE(tun_attr, tun_left, tunnel, tunnel_len) {
>>>>>
>>>>> WARNING: Line is 85 characters long (recommended limit is 79)
>>>>> #2026 FILE: lib/netdev-offload-tc.c:1134:
>>>>> flower.mask.tunnel.id = (tnl->flags & FLOW_TNL_F_KEY) ? tnl_mask->tun_id : 0;
>>>>>
>>>>> ERROR: Improper whitespace around control block
>>>>> #2189 FILE: lib/netdev-offload-tc.c:1297:
>>>>> NL_ATTR_FOR_EACH(nla, left, actions, actions_len) {
>>>>>
>>>>> WARNING: Line is 81 characters long (recommended limit is 79)
>>>>> #2191 FILE: lib/netdev-offload-tc.c:1299:
>>>>> VLOG_DBG_RL(&rl, "Can only support %d actions", flower.action_count);
>>>>>
>>>>> WARNING: Line is 80 characters long (recommended limit is 79)
>>>>> #2311 FILE: lib/netdev-offload-tc.c:1419:
>>>>> VLOG_ERR_RL(&error_rl, "flow get failed (dev %s prio %d handle %d): %s",
>>>>>
>>>>> Lines checked: 4898, Warnings: 9, Errors: 6
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please check this out. If you feel there has been an error, please email aconole at bytheb.org
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> 0-day Robot
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev mailing list
>> dev at openvswitch.org
>> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
>
>
More information about the dev
mailing list