[ovs-dev] [PATCH] ip_gre: Removed unused ipgre netdev ops

Simon Horman simon.horman at netronome.com
Fri Nov 1 16:36:23 UTC 2019


On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 09:24:08AM -0700, Gregory Rose wrote:
> 
> On 11/1/2019 9:20 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 09:02:43AM -0700, Gregory Rose wrote:
> > > On 11/1/2019 8:48 AM, Gregory Rose wrote:
> > > > On 11/1/2019 7:50 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 03:18:23PM -0700, Gregory Rose wrote:
> > > > > > On 10/31/2019 2:08 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 01:30:39PM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> > > > > > > > When cleaning up unused ipgre code the ipgre_netdev_ops structure
> > > > > > > > was missed. Get rid of it now.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Fixes: d5822f428814 ("gre: Remove dead ipgre code")
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Rose <gvrose8192 at gmail.com>
> > > > > > > Applied to master, thanks!
> > > > > > Oh, I guess you didn't see my request to hold off on this.  No worries.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I'll send a follow up patch with some more code to be excised.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > And thanks for the quick response!
> > > > > This appears to break travis-ci.
> > > > > 
> > > > > https://travis-ci.org/openvswitch/ovs/builds/605766351
> > > > OK, it passed here
> > > > https://travis-ci.org/gvrose8192/ovs-experimental/builds/605736578
> > > > 
> > > > Let me check what happened.
> > > > 
> > > > - Greg
> > > So the patch that got applied yesterday is not the patch that I pushed to
> > > test travis.  ipgre_tunnel_init and ipgre_xmit
> > > also supposed to be deleted.  Let's revert the old patch and start over.  I
> > > have no idea what happened.
> > Thanks Greg,
> > 
> > I'm running a revert by travis-ci here:
> > 
> > https://travis-ci.org/horms2/ovs/builds/606077577
> Thanks!  I'm doing that also.  My apologies for the mix up.

Thanks, we can race them :)

Unfortunately I am still seeing a failure so perhaps the following also
needs to be reverted?

	42a059e02bf3 ("ip_gre: Remove even more unused code")

>From a process PoV I think it would be best if you posted
a revert patch(es) that someone can apply. Does that work for you?


More information about the dev mailing list