[ovs-dev] [PATCH v9 2/2] netdev-dpdk:Detailed packet drop statistics

Sriram Vatala sriram.v at altencalsoftlabs.com
Tue Oct 22 08:25:54 UTC 2019


Hi Ilya & Kevin,
Thanks for your suggestions. I am summarizing our discussion, please feel free 
to correct me, if I am wrong.

1) All custom stats calculated in OVS will have the prefix , so that these 
stats will not intersect with the names of other stats (driver/HW etc).
2) The prefix used for these custom stats is "cstat_".
3) Instead of documenting all the stats, I will add a generic note about the 
prefix used for custom stats in "Documentation/topics/dpdk/vhost-user.rst 
where "tx_retries" is documented.

Thanks & Regards,
Sriram.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor at redhat.com>
Sent: 21 October 2019 20:22
To: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets at ovn.org>; Sriram Vatala 
<sriram.v at altencalsoftlabs.com>; ovs-dev at openvswitch.org
Cc: Stokes, Ian <ian.stokes at intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] netdev-dpdk:Detailed packet drop statistics

On 18/10/2019 13:59, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 16.10.2019 19:48, Kevin Traynor wrote:
>> On 16/10/2019 13:16, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>> Hi Kevin,
>>>
>>> Thanks for review. Some comments inline.
>>>
>>> On 16.10.2019 12:15, Kevin Traynor wrote:
>>>> Hi Sriram,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for working on making more fine grained stats for debugging.
>>>> As mentioned yesterday, this patch needs rebase so I just reviewed
>>>> docs and netdev-dpdk.c which applied. Comments below.
>>>>
>>>> On 21/09/2019 03:40, Sriram Vatala wrote:
>>>>> OVS may be unable to transmit packets for multiple reasons and
>>>>> today there is a single counter to track packets dropped due to
>>>>> any of those reasons. The most common reason is that a VM is
>>>>> unable to read packets fast enough causing the vhostuser port
>>>>> transmit queue on the OVS side to become full. This manifests as a
>>>>> problem with VNFs not receiving all packets. Having a separate
>>>>> drop counter to track packets dropped because the transmit queue
>>>>> is full will clearly indicate that the problem is on the VM side
>>>>> and not in OVS. Similarly maintaining separate
>>>>
>>>> It reads like a bit of a contradiction. On one hand the "The *most
>>>> common* reason is that a VM is unable to read packets fast enough".
>>>> While having a stat "*will clearly indicate* that the problem is on
>>>> the VM side".
>>>>
>>>>> counters for all possible drops helps in indicating sensible cause
>>>>> for packet drops.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch adds custom software stats counters to track packets
>>>>> dropped at port level and these counters are displayed along with
>>>>> other stats in "ovs-vsctl get interface <iface> statistics"
>>>>> command. The detailed stats will be available for both dpdk and
>>>>> vhostuser ports.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think the commit msg could be a bit clearer, suggest something
>>>> like below - feel free to modify (or reject):
>>>>
>>>> OVS may be unable to transmit packets for multiple reasons on the
>>>> DPDK datapath and today there is a single counter to track packets
>>>> dropped due to any of those reasons.
>>>>
>>>> This patch adds custom software stats for the different reasons
>>>> packets may be dropped during tx on the DPDK datapath in OVS.
>>>>
>>>> - MTU drops : drops that occur due to a too large packet size
>>>> - Qos drops: drops that occur due to egress QOS
>>>> - Tx failures: drops as returned by the DPDK PMD send function
>>>>
>>>> Note that the reason for tx failures is not specificied in OVS. In
>>>> practice for vhost ports it is most common that tx failures are
>>>> because there are not enough available descriptors, which is
>>>> usually caused by misconfiguration of the guest queues and/or
>>>> because the guest is not consuming packets fast enough from the queues.
>>>>
>>>> These counters are displayed along with other stats in "ovs-vsctl
>>>> get interface <iface> statistics" command and are available for
>>>> dpdk and vhostuser/vhostuserclient ports.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sriram Vatala <sriram.v at altencalsoftlabs.com>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> v9:...
>>>> v8:...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Note that signed-off, --- and version info should be like this ^^^.
>>>> otherwise the review version comments will be in the git commit log
>>>> when it is applied.
>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Changes since v8:
>>>>> Addressed comments given by Ilya.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sriram Vatala <sriram.v at altencalsoftlabs.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    Documentation/topics/dpdk/vhost-user.rst      | 13 ++-
>>>>>    lib/netdev-dpdk.c                             | 81 
>>>>> +++++++++++++++----
>>>>>    utilities/bugtool/automake.mk                 |  3 +-
>>>>>    utilities/bugtool/ovs-bugtool-get-port-stats  | 25 ++++++
>>>>>    .../plugins/network-status/openvswitch.xml    |  1 +
>>>>>    5 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>>>    create mode 100755 utilities/bugtool/ovs-bugtool-get-port-stats
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/topics/dpdk/vhost-user.rst
>>>>> b/Documentation/topics/dpdk/vhost-user.rst
>>>>> index 724aa62f6..89388a2bf 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/topics/dpdk/vhost-user.rst
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/topics/dpdk/vhost-user.rst
>>>>> @@ -551,7 +551,18 @@ processing packets at the required rate.
>>>>>    The amount of Tx retries on a vhost-user or vhost-user-client 
>>>>> interface can be
>>>>>    shown with::
>>>>>
>>>>> -  $ ovs-vsctl get Interface dpdkvhostclient0
>>>>> statistics:tx_retries
>>>>> +  $ ovs-vsctl get Interface dpdkvhostclient0
>>>>> + statistics:netdev_dpdk_tx_retries
>>>>
>>>> I think the "netdev_dpdk_" prefixes should be removed for a few
>>>> reasons,
>>>>
>>>> - These are custom stats that will only be displayed for the dpdk
>>>> ports so they don't need any extra prefix to say they are for dpdk
>>>> ports
>>>>
>>>> - The 'tx_retries' stat is part of OVS 2.12, I don't like to change
>>>> its name to a different one in OVS 2.13 unless there is a very good
>>>> reason
>>>>
>>>> - The existing stats don't have this type of prefixes (granted most
>>>> of them are general stats):
>>>
>>> The main reason for the prefix for me is to distinguish those stats
>>> from the stats that comest from the driver/HW.  Our new stats has
>>> very generic names that could be named a lot like or even equal to
>>> HW stats.  This might be not an issue for vhostuser, but for HW NICs
>>> this may be really confusing for users.
>>>
>>> I'm not insisting on 'netdev_dpdk_' prefix, but, IMHO, we need a way
>>> to clearly distinguish those stats.  We may use different prefixes
>>> like 'sw_' or just 'ovs_'.
>>>
>>
>> ok, I can see that we might want to distinguish custom stats to
>> indicate that they are specific for that device but that also has the
>> side effect of making them less self-descriptive and the user will
>> have to be told somewhere what the prefix means.
>>
>> 'sw_' and 'ovs_' seem better than 'netdev_dpdk_' but it might be
>> confusing too, as for example in DPDK case, Tx drops are calculated
>> in sw/ovs the same as qos/mtu/txfails but won't have that prefix. If
>> we really need a prefix 'cstat_' is the best I can think of.
>
> What we're trying to solve here is to distinguish stats that counted
> internally in OVS from the stats provided by the third parties.
> Just to not have same/similar names
>
> Usual stats from 'netdev_stats' are combined from various sources.
> For example, 'rx_dropped' in netdev-dpdk is a combination of our QoS
> dorps from OVS and HW counters like rte_stats.rx_nombuf.
> For me it looks like for these stats we have kind of best-effort
> policy to provide as full info as possible.  Trying to describe how
> each of these counters calculated doesn't make sense because we do not
> know the origin of many of the components that comes from DPDK or HW.
>
>>
>>>> # ovs-vsctl get Interface dpdkvhost0 statistics
>>>> {"rx_1024_to_1522_packets"=0, "rx_128_to_255_packets"=0,
>>>> "rx_1523_to_max_packets"=0, "rx_1_to_64_packets"=25622176,
>>>> "rx_256_to_511_packets"=0, "rx_512_to_1023_packets"=0,
>>>> "rx_65_to_127_packets"=0, rx_bytes=1537330560, rx_dropped=0,
>>>> rx_errors=0, rx_packets=25622176, tx_bytes=3829825920,
>>>> tx_dropped=0, tx_packets=63830432, tx_retries=0}
>>>>
>>>> Also, just to note that if there are changes to existing
>>>> interfaces/behaviour it should really mention that in the commit
>>>> message so it is highlighted.
>>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +When the guest is not able to consume the packets fast enough,
>>>>> +the transmit queue of the port gets filled up i.e queue runs out of 
>>>>> free descriptors.
>>>>> +This is the most likely reason why dpdk transmit API will fail to
>>>>> +send packets besides other reasons.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +The amount of tx failure drops on a dpdk vhost/physical interface
>>>>> +can be shown with::
>>>>> +
>>>>> +  $ ovs-vsctl get Interface dpdkvhostclient0 \
>>>>> +
>>>>> + statistics:netdev_dpdk_tx_failure_drops
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The commit msg/docs are only focusing on one stat for vhost ports,
>>>> but there are other stats and dpdk ports, so they should all get some 
>>>> mention.
>>>
>>> I don't feel comfortable for documenting custom stats.  This is just
>>> because we can't describe them all.  These are things to be changed over 
>>> time.
>>> And we don't really know what some types of stats means and if they
>>> means the same for different types of HW NICs (they are definitely
>>> not) or OVS netdevs (even within netdev-dpdk).
>>> And that is one more reason to have a prefix for OVS internal
>>> statistics on which we have at least partial control.
>>>
>>> I think, that user documentation could mention some special
>>> statistics while describing the troubleshooting for some hard
>>> special cases, but this should not be a glossary of all the possible
>>> custom stats.  From my point of view, names of the stats should be
>>> as possible self-descriptive and should not require additional 
>>> documentation.
>>>
>>
>> For sure any prefix would need to be explained because that part
>> would not be intuitive.
>
> We could add a note to the common DPDK guide about that in a single 
> sentence:
> "There are custom statistics that OVS accumulates itself and these
> stats has 'your_prefix_here_' as a prefix."
>

yes, that is what I had in mind. It clarifies that it is a custom stat which 
explains why something like vhost tx_dropped does not have this prefix even 
though it is also counted in ovs/sw/netdev_dpdk.

Anyway, I don't want Sriram to be held up over one line of documentation, so 
i'm ok with whatever is decided.

thanks,
Kevin.

> 'cstat_' or 'sw_' might need this, but 'netdev_dpdk_' or 'ovs_' looks
> self-descriptive enough to not do that.
>
>>
>> thanks,
>> Kevin.
>>
>>> BTW, you will not find any description for statistics provided by
>>> the linux or DPDK drivers.  You could only look at the driver code or 
>>> device spec.
>>>
>>> Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
>>>
>>


More information about the dev mailing list