[ovs-dev] [PATCH ovn 00/19] OVN Interconnection

Han Zhou hzhou at ovn.org
Wed Oct 30 21:15:09 UTC 2019


On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 7:51 AM Numan Siddique <numans at ovn.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019, 8:14 PM Han Zhou <hzhou at ovn.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 4:05 AM Numan Siddique <numans at ovn.org> wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 11:28 PM Han Zhou <hzhou at ovn.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 7:25 AM Numan Siddique <numans at ovn.org>
wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 6:23 AM Han Zhou <hzhou at ovn.org> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The series supports interconnecting multiple OVN deployments
(e.g.
>> > >  located at
>> > > > > multiple data centers) through logical routers connected with
tansit
>> > > logical
>> > > > > switches with overlay tunnels, managed through OVN control plane.
>> > See
>> > > the
>> > > > > ovn-architecture.rst document updates for more details, and find
the
>> > > > > instructions in Documentation/tutorials/ovn-interconnection.rst.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The first 6 patches are not directly related to the feature, but
are
>> > > fixes for
>> > > > > existing problems but required by later patches.
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > For the first 5 patches in the series - Acked-by: Numan Siddique
>> > > > <numans at ovn.org>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Thanks Numan. I applied the first 5 patches to master.
>> > >
>> > > > I think these 5 patches can be merged so that the v2 of this series
>> > > > will have lesser patches.
>> > > >
>> > > > Regarding the patch 6, which updates the NEWS, does it makes sense
to
>> > > > delete the contents
>> > > > of this file and  start fresh capturing only OVN related news ? Or
>> > > > it's still better to preserve
>> > > > the contents ?
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Do you mean removing all previous news, or just removing the OVS
related
>> > > news and keep OVN related news?
>> > >
>> > > I am ok with removing all the previous news and replace with a
pointer to
>> > > OVS repo if people want to look at previous OVN news.
>> > >
>> > > However, I think it may be more straightforward to leave as is for
>> > whatever
>> > > is there up to 2.12, which clearly tells how OVN is forked from the
OVS
>> > > project. What do you think?
>> >
>> > Ok. I think this makes more sense. Let's keep it AS IS.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Numan
>> >
>>
>> Thanks Numan. So can I consider this as acked for patch 6, so that I can
>> merge it and send v2 for the rest of the patches.
>
>
> Sure.
> Acked-by: Numan Siddique <numans at ovn.org>
> for patch 6
>
> Numan
>
Thanks. I applied patch 6 to master after rebase.
I sent v2 for the rest of the series at:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/list/?series=139731

Thanks,
Han


More information about the dev mailing list