[ovs-dev] [PATCH ovn v2] ovn-northd: Limit ARP/ND broadcast domain whenever possible.
dceara at redhat.com
Thu Oct 31 11:21:29 UTC 2019
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 9:12 AM Dumitru Ceara <dceara at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 2:05 AM Han Zhou <hzhou at ovn.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 12:11 AM Dumitru Ceara <dceara at redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > ARP request and ND NS packets for router owned IPs were being
> > > flooded in the complete L2 domain (using the MC_FLOOD multicast group).
> > > However this creates a scaling issue in scenarios where aggregation
> > > logical switches are connected to more logical routers (~350). The
> > > logical pipelines of all routers would have to be executed before the
> > > packet is finally replied to by a single router, the owner of the IP
> > > address.
> > >
> > > This commit limits the broadcast domain by bypassing the L2 Lookup stage
> > > for ARP requests that will be replied by a single router. The packets
> > > are still flooded in the L2 domain but not on any of the other patch
> > > ports towards other routers connected to the switch. This restricted
> > > flooding is done by using a new multicast group (MC_ARP_ND_FLOOD).
> > >
> > > IPs that are owned by the routers and for which this fix applies are:
> > > - IP addresses configured on the router ports.
> > > - VIPs.
> > > - NAT IPs.
> > >
> > > Reported-at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1756945
> > > Reported-by: Anil Venkata <vkommadi at redhat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <dceara at redhat.com>
> > >
> > Thanks Dumitru for addressing the issue. I have only one concern, but I am not sure if it would cause real issue. The concern is, this patch changes the behavior that originally if there is any ARP request broadcasted by an external routers, all OVN routers will learn the MAC-IP bindings from the ARP request, but with this change only the one with the requested IP would learn it. At the same time, what if an ARP response (or GARP) is coming? Would it still trigger the same problem since it has to go through all router pipelines?
> Hi Han,
> Indeed, without the patch all connected OVN routers would learn the
> MAC-IP binding from an ARP request. However, even with a reasonably
> sized topology we can easily end up going over the 4K resubmit limit
> for an ARP request broadcast packet because we run all the router
> pipelines. I think that's a bigger problem because there's no way to
> make sure that the ARP request reaches at least the router that owns
> the IP address so we might end up unable to reach part of the network.
> With the fix other routers will now have to resolve the host that they
> would've previously known from the ARP request but in the end we
> should have proper connectivity in the whole network.
> The patch changes the behavior only for ARP requests because replies
> are usually (not always) unicast. GARP requests from external hosts
> are not affected by the fix because we do a host match on the target
> IP and make sure it matches the IPs owned by OVN. In case of an
> external GARP the packet will get flooded to all router pipelines.
> While we might hit the 4K resubmit issue, the reasoning is that at
> least some routers get the packet and learn the mac binding.
> I'll be sending a v3 soon as I need to rebase and add autotests and
> also fix an issue I had for packets coming from VXLAN tunnels.
v3 which should cover the newly added IPv6 NAT case and addresses
More information about the dev