[ovs-dev] dpdk-latest rebase

Ilya Maximets i.maximets at ovn.org
Fri Sep 27 08:04:54 UTC 2019

On 27.09.2019 10:43, David Marchand wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 9:45 PM Stokes, Ian <ian.stokes at intel.com> wrote:
>> On 9/26/2019 1:09 PM, David Marchand wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:41 AM Ilya Maximets <i.maximets at ovn.org> wrote:
>>>> On 26.09.2019 12:08, Stokes, Ian wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> the dpdk-latest branch has been lagging behind ovs master for a bit.
>>>>> Now that the OVS 2.12 release is out it seems timely to rebase it on> top of OVS master and push, note as before this will be a force push> on the dpdk-latest branch as the rebase on master will change the
>>>>> commit history.
>>>>> I intend to do this today, are there any objections to this?
>>>> Sounds good to me. Thanks!
>>>> BTW, last time I tried to build the dpdk-latest branch there was
>>>> issues with sparse, i.e. some DPDK headers didn't want to build.
>>>> So, there is a probability that some additional fixes required.
>>> ovs rte_flow.h (sparse header) is out of sync with dpdk master.
>>> Either we resync it or we remove it :-).
>> I've just pushed the rebase. I can take a look at fixing at the sparse
>> header for rte_flow.h in the coming days to help fix travis.
> Just tested it, got bitten by some build issue related to ovn removal,
> but I suppose this is because my workdir was already configured.
>  From scratch, it works fine.
> Thanks.
> About sparse and rte_flow.h, just removing include/sparse/rte_flow.h
> header does the trick.
> I inserted issues in the rte_flow.h from my compiled dpdk and sparse
> properly reported them when building ovs.
> What is the reason for keeping this copy of the file in ovs?

I think that you fixed the reason recently on DPDK master by the following
   fbb25a3878cc ("ethdev: fix endian annotation for SPI item")

OVS master branch will not build with DPDK 18.11 and sparse enabled.

Best regards, Ilya Maximets.

More information about the dev mailing list