[ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] Make ByteQ safe for simultaneous producer/consumer
anton.ivanov at cambridgegreys.com
Fri Jun 5 12:46:02 UTC 2020
On 04/06/2020 21:47, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 08:21:49AM +0100, anton.ivanov at cambridgegreys.com wrote:
>> From: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov at cambridgegreys.com>
>> A ByteQ with unlocked head and tail is unsafe for simultaneous
> It isn't meant for that use, or at least it wasn't. If you're changing
> the goal then you should document the new guarantees, as do the other
> OVS data structures that have thread-safety guarantees.
Ack. I will do in the next patch revision.
It is guaranteed for parallel use by ONE producer and ONE consumer. More
than one on either side will not work.
Anton R. Ivanov
Cambridgegreys Limited. Registered in England. Company Number 10273661
More information about the dev