[ovs-dev] [PATCH V3 12/12] netdev-offload-dpdk: Fix Ethernet matching for type only

Ilya Maximets i.maximets at ovn.org
Mon Jun 29 00:38:35 UTC 2020


On 6/21/20 1:19 PM, Eli Britstein wrote:
> For OVS rule of the form "eth type is 0x1234 / end", rule is offloaded
> in the form of "eth / end", which is incorrect. Fix it.
> 
> Fixes: e8a2b5bf92bb ("netdev-dpdk: implement flow offload with rte flow")
> Signed-off-by: Eli Britstein <elibr at mellanox.com>
> Reviewed-by: Roni Bar Yanai <roniba at mellanox.com>
> ---
>  lib/netdev-offload-dpdk.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/netdev-offload-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-offload-dpdk.c
> index e8b8d6464..e68b6549c 100644
> --- a/lib/netdev-offload-dpdk.c
> +++ b/lib/netdev-offload-dpdk.c
> @@ -860,7 +860,8 @@ parse_flow_match(struct flow_patterns *patterns,
>  
>      /* Eth */
>      if (!eth_addr_is_zero(match->wc.masks.dl_src) ||
> -        !eth_addr_is_zero(match->wc.masks.dl_dst)) {
> +        !eth_addr_is_zero(match->wc.masks.dl_dst) ||
> +        match->wc.masks.dl_type) {

While calling from the userspace datapath, we always have a match on dl_type.
This means that it's not possible to hit the 'else' condition.
I'm worried about the usecase described there.  It's hard to track changes
in i40e_flow.c.  Can someone test this with XL710?

>          struct rte_flow_item_eth *spec, *mask;
>  
>          spec = xzalloc(sizeof *spec);
> @@ -876,6 +877,7 @@ parse_flow_match(struct flow_patterns *patterns,
>  
>          memset(&consumed_masks->dl_dst, 0, sizeof consumed_masks->dl_dst);
>          memset(&consumed_masks->dl_src, 0, sizeof consumed_masks->dl_src);
> +        consumed_masks->dl_type = 0;
>  
>          add_flow_pattern(patterns, RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ETH, spec, mask);
>      } else {
> @@ -888,7 +890,6 @@ parse_flow_match(struct flow_patterns *patterns,
>           */
>          add_flow_pattern(patterns, RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ETH, NULL, NULL);

Actually looking at i40e_flow.c, it seems like this pattern will be rejected.
But I'm not sure.

>      }
> -    consumed_masks->dl_type = 0;
>  
>      /* VLAN */
>      if (match->wc.masks.vlans[0].tci && match->flow.vlans[0].tci) {
> 



More information about the dev mailing list