[ovs-dev] OVN Mailing List Suggestions
dceara at redhat.com
Wed Sep 2 10:30:31 UTC 2020
On 9/2/20 12:19 PM, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> On 9/1/20 9:47 PM, Mark Michelson wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> For the past eternity, there have been light discussions on various
>> mediums about splitting OVN to its own mailing list(s). As it stands,
>> OVN discussions and patch submissions are disjoint from OVS, so
>> separating it out to its own list makes sense. We did some asking
>> around to try to see if anyone that we know to host mailing lists might
>> be willing to host an OVN mailing list. Everyone said no. This includes
>> the Linux Foundation, who already host the OVS lists.
>> A few weeks ago, I looked into publicly available mailing list hosts.
>> The issue there is that, of course, money is a factor. And essentially,
>> you get what you pay for. The cheap options were missing key features
>> and didn't offer much support or reliability guarantees, and the
>> expensive ones were expensive.
>> This led to a discussion today on a call between Red Hat and VMWare
>> about the topic. We came up with some ideas about how to move forward
>> with this.
>> Option 1: Use Google Groups. Dan Williams and I did a quick and dirty
>> test with the ovn-kubernetes Google Group and found that patch emails
>> come through properly and can be applied directly to the code. So there
>> should be no issue in trying to continue our current workflow with it.
I'm not sure how patchwork integration works but if we go for option 1 +
patch submissions it would be nice if we could still use patchwork.
>> Option 2: Use Github Pull Requests. This would at least get patch
>> submissions off the OVS list. We would still need to use the OVS list
>> for OVN discussions though (unless we think Github issues are
>> appropriate). Github PRs also gives us a simpler way of adding CI.
>> Option 3: A gracious volunteer offers to host the OVN list(s). If
>> someone reading this is willing to have their company host the mailing
>> list or host it themselves, then that'd be cool. Understand that this
>> would require a good amount of work to maintain.
>> Option 4: A gracious volunteer offers money to pay for the list(s) to be
>> hosted by one of the public companies that hosts mailing lists.
>> Option 5: Do nothing. If email filters are good enough, then so be it.
>> We can drop the topic entirely and never bring it up again.
> I'm probably biased because I follow the OVN related discussions on this
> list more than the OVS ones but filters are good enough for me.
> I am however not against any of the other options above.
More information about the dev