[ovs-dev] [PATCH ovn branch-20.03 13/16] ofctrl.c: Add a predictable resolution for conflicting flow actions.

Frode Nordahl frode.nordahl at canonical.com
Thu Feb 18 08:50:49 UTC 2021


From: Dumitru Ceara <dceara at redhat.com>

Until now, in case the ACL configuration generates openflows that have
the same match but different actions, ovn-controller was using the
following approach:
1. If the flow being added contains conjunctive actions, merge its
   actions with the already existing flow.
2. Otherwise, if the flow is being added incrementally
   (update_installed_flows_by_track), don't install the new flow but
   instead keep the old one.
3. Otherwise, (update_installed_flows_by_compare), don't install the
   new flow but instead keep the old one.

Even though one can argue that having an ACL with a match that includes
the match of another ACL is a misconfiguration, it can happen that the
users provision OVN like this.  Depending on the order of reading and
installing the logical flows, the above operations can yield
unpredictable results, e.g., allow specific traffic but then after
ovn-controller is restarted (or a recompute happens) that specific
traffic starts being dropped.

A simple example of ACL configuration is:
ovn-nbctl acl-add ls to-lport 3 '(ip4.src==10.0.0.1 ||
ip4.src==10.0.0.2) && (ip4.dst == 10.0.0.3 || ip4.dst == 10.0.0.4)' allow
ovn-nbctl acl-add ls to-lport 3 'ip4.src==10.0.0.1' allow
ovn-nbctl acl-add ls to-lport 2 'arp' allow
ovn-nbctl acl-add ls to-lport 1 'ip4' drop

This is a pattern used by most CMSs:
- define a default deny policy.
- punch holes in the default deny policy based on user specific
  configurations.

Without this commit the behavior for traffic from 10.0.0.1 to 10.0.0.5
is unpredictable.  Depending on the order of operations traffic might be
dropped or allowed.

It's also quite hard to force the CMS to ensure that such match overlaps
never occur.

To address this issue we now ensure that all desired flows refering the
same installed flow are partially sorted in the following way:
- first all flows with action "allow".
- then all flows with action "drop".
- then a single flow with action "conjunction" (resulting from merging
  all flows with the same match and action conjunction).

This ensures that "allow" flows have precedence over "drop" flows which
in turn have precedence over "conjunction" flows.  Essentially less
restrictive flows are always preferred over more restrictive flows whenever a match
conflict happens.

CC: Daniel Alvarez <dalvarez at redhat.com>
Reported-at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1871931
Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <dceara at redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mark Gray <mark.d.gray at redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Han Zhou <hzhou at ovn.org>
(cherry picked from commit 986b3d5e4ad6f05245d021ba699c957246294a22)
Signed-off-by: Frode Nordahl <frode.nordahl at canonical.com>
---
 controller/ofctrl.c |  74 +++++++++++++--
 tests/ovn.at        | 214 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 283 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/controller/ofctrl.c b/controller/ofctrl.c
index f06b68b78..60ce6f1c2 100644
--- a/controller/ofctrl.c
+++ b/controller/ofctrl.c
@@ -188,6 +188,14 @@ struct sb_flow_ref {
  * relationship is 1 to N. A link is added when a flow addition is processed.
  * A link is removed when a flow deletion is processed, the desired flow
  * table is cleared, or the installed flow table is cleared.
+ *
+ * To ensure predictable behavior, the list of desired flows is maintained
+ * partially sorted in the following way (from least restrictive to most
+ * restrictive wrt. match):
+ * - allow flows without action conjunction.
+ * - drop flows without action conjunction.
+ * - a single flow with action conjunction.
+ *
  * The first desired_flow in the list is the active one, the one that is
  * actually installed.
  */
@@ -795,6 +803,12 @@ ofctrl_recv(const struct ofp_header *oh, enum ofptype type)
     }
 }
 
+static bool
+flow_action_has_drop(const struct ovn_flow *f)
+{
+    return f->ofpacts_len == 0;
+}
+
 static bool
 flow_action_has_conj(const struct ovn_flow *f)
 {
@@ -808,6 +822,33 @@ flow_action_has_conj(const struct ovn_flow *f)
     return false;
 }
 
+static bool
+flow_action_has_allow(const struct ovn_flow *f)
+{
+    return !flow_action_has_drop(f) && !flow_action_has_conj(f);
+}
+
+/* Returns true if flow 'a' is preferred over flow 'b'. */
+static bool
+flow_is_preferred(const struct ovn_flow *a, const struct ovn_flow *b)
+{
+    if (flow_action_has_allow(b)) {
+        return false;
+    }
+    if (flow_action_has_allow(a)) {
+        return true;
+    }
+    if (flow_action_has_drop(b)) {
+        return false;
+    }
+    if (flow_action_has_drop(a)) {
+        return true;
+    }
+
+    /* Flows 'a' and 'b' should never both have action conjunction. */
+    OVS_NOT_REACHED();
+}
+
 /* Adds the desired flow to the list of desired flows that have same match
  * conditions as the installed flow.
  *
@@ -820,8 +861,18 @@ flow_action_has_conj(const struct ovn_flow *f)
 static bool
 link_installed_to_desired(struct installed_flow *i, struct desired_flow *d)
 {
+    struct desired_flow *f;
+
+    /* Find first 'f' such that 'd' is preferred over 'f'.  If no such desired
+     * flow exists then 'f' will point after the last element of the list.
+     */
+    LIST_FOR_EACH (f, installed_ref_list_node, &i->desired_refs) {
+        if (flow_is_preferred(&d->flow, &f->flow)) {
+            break;
+        }
+    }
+    ovs_list_insert(&f->installed_ref_list_node, &d->installed_ref_list_node);
     d->installed_flow = i;
-    ovs_list_push_back(&i->desired_refs, &d->installed_ref_list_node);
     return installed_flow_get_active(i) == d;
 }
 
@@ -1728,8 +1779,14 @@ update_installed_flows_by_compare(struct ovn_desired_flow_table *flow_table,
             link_installed_to_desired(i, d);
         } else if (!d->installed_flow) {
             /* This is a desired_flow that conflicts with one installed
-             * previously but not linked yet. */
-            link_installed_to_desired(i, d);
+             * previously but not linked yet.  However, if this flow becomes
+             * active, e.g., it is less restrictive than the previous active
+             * flow then modify the installed flow.
+             */
+            if (link_installed_to_desired(i, d)) {
+                installed_flow_mod(&i->flow, &d->flow, msgs);
+                ovn_flow_log(&i->flow, "updating installed (conflict)");
+            }
         }
     }
 }
@@ -1858,8 +1915,15 @@ update_installed_flows_by_track(struct ovn_desired_flow_table *flow_table,
                 ovn_flow_log(&i->flow, "updating installed (tracked)");
             } else {
                 /* Adding a new flow that conflicts with an existing installed
-                 * flow, so just add it to the link. */
-                link_installed_to_desired(i, f);
+                 * flow, so add it to the link.  If this flow becomes active,
+                 * e.g., it is less restrictive than the previous active flow
+                 * then modify the installed flow.
+                 */
+                if (link_installed_to_desired(i, f)) {
+                    installed_flow_mod(&i->flow, &f->flow, msgs);
+                    ovn_flow_log(&i->flow,
+                                 "updating installed (tracked conflict)");
+                }
             }
             /* The track_list_node emptyness is used to check if the node is
              * already added to track list, so initialize it again here. */
diff --git a/tests/ovn.at b/tests/ovn.at
index 92c37a74d..b186adefb 100644
--- a/tests/ovn.at
+++ b/tests/ovn.at
@@ -12551,6 +12551,220 @@ grep conjunction.*conjunction.*conjunction | wc -l`])
 OVN_CLEANUP([hv1])
 AT_CLEANUP
 
+AT_SETUP([ovn -- Superseeding ACLs with conjunction])
+ovn_start
+
+ovn-nbctl ls-add ls1
+
+ovn-nbctl lsp-add ls1 ls1-lp1 \
+-- lsp-set-addresses ls1-lp1 "f0:00:00:00:00:01"
+
+ovn-nbctl lsp-add ls1 ls1-lp2 \
+-- lsp-set-addresses ls1-lp2 "f0:00:00:00:00:02"
+
+net_add n1
+sim_add hv1
+
+as hv1
+ovs-vsctl add-br br-phys
+ovn_attach n1 br-phys 192.168.0.1
+ovs-vsctl -- add-port br-int hv1-vif1 -- \
+    set interface hv1-vif1 external-ids:iface-id=ls1-lp1 \
+    options:tx_pcap=hv1/vif1-tx.pcap \
+    options:rxq_pcap=hv1/vif1-rx.pcap \
+    ofport-request=1
+
+ovs-vsctl -- add-port br-int hv1-vif2 -- \
+    set interface hv1-vif2 external-ids:iface-id=ls1-lp2 \
+    options:tx_pcap=hv1/vif2-tx.pcap \
+    options:rxq_pcap=hv1/vif2-rx.pcap \
+    ofport-request=2
+
+# test_ip INPORT SRC_MAC DST_MAC SRC_IP DST_IP OUTPORT...
+#
+# This shell function causes an ip packet to be received on INPORT.
+# The packet's content has Ethernet destination DST and source SRC
+# (each exactly 12 hex digits) and Ethernet type ETHTYPE (4 hex digits).
+# The OUTPORTs (zero or more) list the VIFs on which the packet should
+# be received.  INPORT and the OUTPORTs are specified as logical switch
+# port numbers, e.g. 11 for vif11.
+test_ip() {
+    # This packet has bad checksums but logical L3 routing doesn't check.
+    local inport=$1 src_mac=$2 dst_mac=$3 src_ip=$4 dst_ip=$5
+    local packet=${dst_mac}${src_mac}08004500001c0000000040110000${src_ip}\
+${dst_ip}0035111100080000
+    shift; shift; shift; shift; shift
+    as hv1 ovs-appctl netdev-dummy/receive hv1-vif1 $packet
+    for outport; do
+        echo $packet >> $outport.expected
+    done
+}
+
+ip_to_hex() {
+    printf "%02x%02x%02x%02x" "$@"
+}
+
+reset_pcap_file() {
+    local iface=$1
+    local pcap_file=$2
+    ovs-vsctl -- set Interface $iface options:tx_pcap=dummy-tx.pcap \
+options:rxq_pcap=dummy-rx.pcap
+    rm -f ${pcap_file}*.pcap
+    ovs-vsctl -- set Interface $iface options:tx_pcap=${pcap_file}-tx.pcap \
+options:rxq_pcap=${pcap_file}-rx.pcap
+}
+
+# Add a default deny ACL and an allow ACL for specific IP traffic.
+ovn-nbctl acl-add ls1 to-lport 2 'arp' allow
+ovn-nbctl acl-add ls1 to-lport 1 'ip4' drop
+ovn-nbctl acl-add ls1 to-lport 3 '(ip4.src==10.0.0.1 || ip4.src==10.0.0.2) && (ip4.dst == 10.0.0.3 || ip4.dst == 10.0.0.4)' allow
+ovn-nbctl acl-add ls1 to-lport 3 '(ip4.src==10.0.0.1 || ip4.src==10.0.0.42) && (ip4.dst == 10.0.0.3 || ip4.dst == 10.0.0.4)' allow
+ovn-nbctl --wait=hv sync
+
+# Traffic 10.0.0.1, 10.0.0.2 -> 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 should be allowed.
+for src in `seq 1 2`; do
+    for dst in `seq 3 4`; do
+        sip=`ip_to_hex 10 0 0 $src`
+        dip=`ip_to_hex 10 0 0 $dst`
+
+        test_ip 1 f00000000001 f00000000002 $sip $dip 2
+    done
+done
+
+# Traffic 10.0.0.1, 10.0.0.2 -> 10.0.0.5 should be dropped.
+dip=`ip_to_hex 10 0 0 5`
+for src in `seq 1 2`; do
+    sip=`ip_to_hex 10 0 0 $src`
+
+    test_ip 1 f00000000001 f00000000002 $sip $dip
+done
+
+cat 2.expected > expout
+$PYTHON "$ovs_srcdir/utilities/ovs-pcap.in" hv1/vif2-tx.pcap > 2.packets
+AT_CHECK([cat 2.packets], [0], [expout])
+reset_pcap_file hv1-vif2 hv1/vif2
+rm -f 2.packets
+> 2.expected
+
+# Add two less restrictive allow ACLs for src IP 10.0.0.1.
+ovn-nbctl acl-add ls1 to-lport 3 'ip4.src==10.0.0.1 || ip4.src==10.0.0.1' allow
+ovn-nbctl acl-add ls1 to-lport 3 'ip4.src==10.0.0.1' allow
+ovn-nbctl --wait=hv sync
+
+# Check OVS flows, the less restrictive flows should have been installed.
+AT_CHECK([as hv1 ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-int table=45 | \
+    grep "priority=1003" | awk '{print $7 " " $8}' | sort], [0], [dnl
+priority=1003,conj_id=2,ip,metadata=0x1 actions=resubmit(,46)
+priority=1003,conj_id=3,ip,metadata=0x1 actions=resubmit(,46)
+priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_dst=10.0.0.3 actions=conjunction(2,1/2),conjunction(3,1/2)
+priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_dst=10.0.0.4 actions=conjunction(2,1/2),conjunction(3,1/2)
+priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_src=10.0.0.1 actions=resubmit(,46)
+priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_src=10.0.0.2 actions=conjunction(2,2/2)
+priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_src=10.0.0.42 actions=conjunction(3,2/2)
+])
+
+# Traffic 10.0.0.1, 10.0.0.2 -> 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 should be allowed.
+for src in `seq 1 2`; do
+    for dst in `seq 3 4`; do
+        sip=`ip_to_hex 10 0 0 $src`
+        dip=`ip_to_hex 10 0 0 $dst`
+
+        test_ip 1 f00000000001 f00000000002 $sip $dip 2
+    done
+done
+
+# Traffic 10.0.0.2 -> 10.0.0.5 should be dropped.
+sip=`ip_to_hex 10 0 0 2`
+dip=`ip_to_hex 10 0 0 5`
+test_ip 1 f00000000001 f00000000002 $sip $dip
+
+# Traffic 10.0.0.1 -> 10.0.0.5 should be allowed.
+sip=`ip_to_hex 10 0 0 1`
+dip=`ip_to_hex 10 0 0 5`
+test_ip 1 f00000000001 f00000000002 $sip $dip 2
+
+cat 2.expected > expout
+$PYTHON "$ovs_srcdir/utilities/ovs-pcap.in" hv1/vif2-tx.pcap > 2.packets
+AT_CHECK([cat 2.packets], [0], [expout])
+reset_pcap_file hv1-vif2 hv1/vif2
+rm -f 2.packets
+> 2.expected
+
+#sleep infinity
+
+# Remove the first less restrictive allow ACL.
+ovn-nbctl acl-del ls1 to-lport 3 'ip4.src==10.0.0.1 || ip4.src==10.0.0.1'
+ovn-nbctl --wait=hv sync
+
+# Check OVS flows, the second less restrictive allow ACL should have been installed.
+AT_CHECK([as hv1 ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-int table=45 | \
+    grep "priority=1003" | awk '{print $7 " " $8}' | sort], [0], [dnl
+priority=1003,conj_id=2,ip,metadata=0x1 actions=resubmit(,46)
+priority=1003,conj_id=3,ip,metadata=0x1 actions=resubmit(,46)
+priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_dst=10.0.0.3 actions=conjunction(2,1/2),conjunction(3,1/2)
+priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_dst=10.0.0.4 actions=conjunction(2,1/2),conjunction(3,1/2)
+priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_src=10.0.0.1 actions=resubmit(,46)
+priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_src=10.0.0.2 actions=conjunction(2,2/2)
+priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_src=10.0.0.42 actions=conjunction(3,2/2)
+])
+
+# Remove the less restrictive allow ACL.
+ovn-nbctl acl-del ls1 to-lport 3 'ip4.src==10.0.0.1'
+ovn-nbctl --wait=hv sync
+
+# Check OVS flows, the 10.0.0.1 conjunction should have been reinstalled.
+AT_CHECK([as hv1 ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-int table=45 | \
+    grep "priority=1003" | awk '{print $7 " " $8}' | sort], [0], [dnl
+priority=1003,conj_id=2,ip,metadata=0x1 actions=resubmit(,46)
+priority=1003,conj_id=3,ip,metadata=0x1 actions=resubmit(,46)
+priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_dst=10.0.0.3 actions=conjunction(2,1/2),conjunction(3,1/2)
+priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_dst=10.0.0.4 actions=conjunction(2,1/2),conjunction(3,1/2)
+priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_src=10.0.0.1 actions=conjunction(2,2/2),conjunction(3,2/2)
+priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_src=10.0.0.2 actions=conjunction(2,2/2)
+priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_src=10.0.0.42 actions=conjunction(3,2/2)
+])
+
+# Traffic 10.0.0.1, 10.0.0.2 -> 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 should be allowed.
+for src in `seq 1 2`; do
+    for dst in `seq 3 4`; do
+        sip=`ip_to_hex 10 0 0 $src`
+        dip=`ip_to_hex 10 0 0 $dst`
+
+        test_ip 1 f00000000001 f00000000002 $sip $dip 2
+    done
+done
+
+# Traffic 10.0.0.1, 10.0.0.2 -> 10.0.0.5 should be dropped.
+dip=`ip_to_hex 10 0 0 5`
+for src in `seq 1 2`; do
+    sip=`ip_to_hex 10 0 0 $src`
+
+    test_ip 1 f00000000001 f00000000002 $sip $dip
+done
+
+cat 2.expected > expout
+$PYTHON "$ovs_srcdir/utilities/ovs-pcap.in" hv1/vif2-tx.pcap > 2.packets
+AT_CHECK([cat 2.packets], [0], [expout])
+
+# Re-add the less restrictive allow ACL for src IP 10.0.0.1
+ovn-nbctl acl-add ls1 to-lport 3 'ip4.src==10.0.0.1' allow
+ovn-nbctl --wait=hv sync
+
+# Check OVS flows, the less restrictive flows should have been installed.
+AT_CHECK([as hv1 ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-int table=45 | \
+   grep "priority=1003" | awk '{print $7 " " $8}' | sort], [0], [dnl
+priority=1003,conj_id=2,ip,metadata=0x1 actions=resubmit(,46)
+priority=1003,conj_id=3,ip,metadata=0x1 actions=resubmit(,46)
+priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_dst=10.0.0.3 actions=conjunction(2,1/2),conjunction(3,1/2)
+priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_dst=10.0.0.4 actions=conjunction(2,1/2),conjunction(3,1/2)
+priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_src=10.0.0.1 actions=resubmit(,46)
+priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_src=10.0.0.2 actions=conjunction(2,2/2)
+priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_src=10.0.0.42 actions=conjunction(3,2/2)
+])
+
+OVN_CLEANUP([hv1])
+AT_CLEANUP
+
 # 3 hypervisors, one logical switch, 3 logical ports per hypervisor
 AT_SETUP([ovn -- L2 Drop and Allow ACL w/ Stateful ACL])
 ovn_start
-- 
2.30.0



More information about the dev mailing list