[ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 10/12] net: bonding: ensure .ndo_get_stats64 can sleep
Vladimir Oltean
olteanv at gmail.com
Tue Jan 5 18:59:00 UTC 2021
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean at nxp.com>
There is an effort to convert .ndo_get_stats64 to sleepable context, and
for that to work, we need to prevent callers of dev_get_stats from using
atomic locking.
The bonding driver retrieves its statistics recursively from its lower
interfaces, with additional care to only count packets sent/received
while those lowers were actually enslaved to the bond - see commit
5f0c5f73e5ef ("bonding: make global bonding stats more reliable").
Since commit 87163ef9cda7 ("bonding: remove last users of bond->lock and
bond->lock itself"), the bonding driver uses the following protection
for its array of slaves: RCU for readers and rtnl_mutex for updaters.
This is not great because there is another movement [ somehow
simultaneous with the one to make .ndo_get_stats64 sleepable ] to reduce
driver usage of rtnl_mutex. This makes sense, because the rtnl_mutex has
become a very contended resource.
The aforementioned commit removed an interesting comment:
/* [...] we can't hold bond->lock [...] because we'll
* deadlock. The only solution is to rely on the fact
* that we're under rtnl_lock here, and the slaves
* list won't change. This doesn't solve the problem
* of setting the slave's MTU while it is
* transmitting, but the assumption is that the base
* driver can handle that.
*
* TODO: figure out a way to safely iterate the slaves
* list, but without holding a lock around the actual
* call to the base driver.
*/
The above summarizes pretty well the challenges we have with nested
bonding interfaces (bond over bond over bond over...), which need to be
addressed by a better locking scheme that also not relies on the bloated
rtnl_mutex.
Instead of using something as broad as the rtnl_mutex to ensure
serialization of updates to the slave array, we can reintroduce a
private mutex in the bonding driver, called slaves_lock.
This mutex circles the only updater, bond_update_slave_arr, and ensures
that whatever other readers want to see a consistent slave array, they
don't need to hold the rtnl_mutex for that.
Now _of_course_ I did not convert the entire driver to use
bond_for_each_slave protected by the bond->slaves_lock, and
rtnl_dereference to bond_dereference. I just started that process by
converting the one reader I needed: ndo_get_stats64. Not only is it nice
to not hold rtnl_mutex in .ndo_get_stats64, but it is also in fact
forbidden to do so (since top-level callers may hold netif_lists_lock,
which is a sub-lock of the rtnl_mutex, and therefore this would cause a
lock inversion and a deadlock).
To solve the nesting problem, the simple way is to not hold any locks
when recursing into the slave netdev operation, which is exactly the
approach that we take. We can "cheat" and use dev_hold to take a
reference on the slave net_device, which is enough to ensure that
netdev_wait_allrefs() waits until we finish, and the kernel won't fault.
However, the slave structure might no longer be valid, just its
associated net_device. That isn't a biggie. We just need to do some more
work to ensure that the slave exists after we took the statistics, and
if it still does, reapply the logic from Andy's commit 5f0c5f73e5ef.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean at nxp.com>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 120 +++++++++++++++-----------------
include/net/bonding.h | 52 +++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 714aa0e5d041..fbae3b9746fc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -3693,77 +3693,65 @@ static void bond_fold_stats(struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_res,
}
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
-static int bond_get_lowest_level_rcu(struct net_device *dev)
-{
- struct net_device *ldev, *next, *now, *dev_stack[MAX_NEST_DEV + 1];
- struct list_head *niter, *iter, *iter_stack[MAX_NEST_DEV + 1];
- int cur = 0, max = 0;
-
- now = dev;
- iter = &dev->adj_list.lower;
-
- while (1) {
- next = NULL;
- while (1) {
- ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev_rcu(now, &iter);
- if (!ldev)
- break;
-
- next = ldev;
- niter = &ldev->adj_list.lower;
- dev_stack[cur] = now;
- iter_stack[cur++] = iter;
- if (max <= cur)
- max = cur;
- break;
- }
-
- if (!next) {
- if (!cur)
- return max;
- next = dev_stack[--cur];
- niter = iter_stack[cur];
- }
-
- now = next;
- iter = niter;
- }
-
- return max;
-}
-#endif
-
static void bond_get_stats(struct net_device *bond_dev,
struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats)
{
struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
- struct rtnl_link_stats64 temp;
- struct list_head *iter;
- struct slave *slave;
- int nest_level = 0;
+ struct rtnl_link_stats64 *dev_stats;
+ struct net_device **slaves;
+ int i, res, num_slaves;
+ res = bond_get_slave_arr(bond, &slaves, &num_slaves);
+ if (res) {
+ netdev_err(bond->dev,
+ "failed to allocate memory for slave array\n");
+ return;
+ }
- rcu_read_lock();
-#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
- nest_level = bond_get_lowest_level_rcu(bond_dev);
-#endif
+ dev_stats = kcalloc(num_slaves, sizeof(*dev_stats), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!dev_stats) {
+ netdev_err(bond->dev,
+ "failed to allocate memory for slave stats\n");
+ bond_put_slave_arr(slaves, num_slaves);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* Recurse with no locks taken */
+ for (i = 0; i < num_slaves; i++)
+ dev_get_stats(slaves[i], &dev_stats[i]);
+
+ /* When taking the slaves lock again, the new slave array might be
+ * different from the original one.
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&bond->slaves_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&bond->stats_lock);
- spin_lock_nested(&bond->stats_lock, nest_level);
memcpy(stats, &bond->bond_stats, sizeof(*stats));
- bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter) {
- dev_get_stats(slave->dev, &temp);
+ for (i = 0; i < num_slaves; i++) {
+ struct list_head *iter;
+ struct slave *slave;
- bond_fold_stats(stats, &temp, &slave->slave_stats);
+ bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
+ if (slave->dev != slaves[i])
+ continue;
- /* save off the slave stats for the next run */
- memcpy(&slave->slave_stats, &temp, sizeof(temp));
+ bond_fold_stats(stats, &dev_stats[i],
+ &slave->slave_stats);
+
+ /* save off the slave stats for the next run */
+ memcpy(&slave->slave_stats, &dev_stats[i],
+ sizeof(dev_stats[i]));
+ break;
+ }
}
memcpy(&bond->bond_stats, stats, sizeof(*stats));
- spin_unlock(&bond->stats_lock);
- rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ mutex_unlock(&bond->stats_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&bond->slaves_lock);
+
+ bond_put_slave_arr(slaves, num_slaves);
}
static int bond_do_ioctl(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd)
@@ -4287,11 +4275,11 @@ static void bond_set_slave_arr(struct bonding *bond,
{
struct bond_up_slave *usable, *all;
- usable = rtnl_dereference(bond->usable_slaves);
+ usable = bond_dereference(bond, bond->usable_slaves);
rcu_assign_pointer(bond->usable_slaves, usable_slaves);
kfree_rcu(usable, rcu);
- all = rtnl_dereference(bond->all_slaves);
+ all = bond_dereference(bond, bond->all_slaves);
rcu_assign_pointer(bond->all_slaves, all_slaves);
kfree_rcu(all, rcu);
}
@@ -4333,6 +4321,8 @@ int bond_update_slave_arr(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *skipslave)
WARN_ON(lockdep_is_held(&bond->mode_lock));
#endif
+ mutex_lock(&bond->slaves_lock);
+
usable_slaves = kzalloc(struct_size(usable_slaves, arr,
bond->slave_cnt), GFP_KERNEL);
all_slaves = kzalloc(struct_size(all_slaves, arr,
@@ -4376,17 +4366,22 @@ int bond_update_slave_arr(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *skipslave)
}
bond_set_slave_arr(bond, usable_slaves, all_slaves);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&bond->slaves_lock);
+
return ret;
out:
if (ret != 0 && skipslave) {
- bond_skip_slave(rtnl_dereference(bond->all_slaves),
+ bond_skip_slave(bond_dereference(bond, bond->all_slaves),
skipslave);
- bond_skip_slave(rtnl_dereference(bond->usable_slaves),
+ bond_skip_slave(bond_dereference(bond, bond->usable_slaves),
skipslave);
}
kfree_rcu(all_slaves, rcu);
kfree_rcu(usable_slaves, rcu);
+ mutex_unlock(&bond->slaves_lock);
+
return ret;
}
@@ -4699,6 +4694,8 @@ void bond_setup(struct net_device *bond_dev)
{
struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
+ mutex_init(&bond->slaves_lock);
+ mutex_init(&bond->stats_lock);
spin_lock_init(&bond->mode_lock);
bond->params = bonding_defaults;
@@ -5189,7 +5186,6 @@ static int bond_init(struct net_device *bond_dev)
if (!bond->wq)
return -ENOMEM;
- spin_lock_init(&bond->stats_lock);
netdev_lockdep_set_classes(bond_dev);
list_add_tail(&bond->bond_list, &bn->dev_list);
diff --git a/include/net/bonding.h b/include/net/bonding.h
index adc3da776970..3fd2443e7800 100644
--- a/include/net/bonding.h
+++ b/include/net/bonding.h
@@ -222,7 +222,6 @@ struct bonding {
* ALB mode (6) - to sync the use and modifications of its hash table
*/
spinlock_t mode_lock;
- spinlock_t stats_lock;
u8 send_peer_notif;
u8 igmp_retrans;
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
@@ -249,6 +248,14 @@ struct bonding {
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD
struct xfrm_state *xs;
#endif /* CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD */
+
+ /* Protects the slave array. TODO: convert all instances of
+ * rtnl_dereference to bond_dereference
+ */
+ struct mutex slaves_lock;
+
+ /* Serializes access to bond_stats */
+ struct mutex stats_lock;
};
#define bond_slave_get_rcu(dev) \
@@ -257,6 +264,9 @@ struct bonding {
#define bond_slave_get_rtnl(dev) \
((struct slave *) rtnl_dereference(dev->rx_handler_data))
+#define bond_dereference(bond, p) \
+ rcu_dereference_protected(p, lockdep_is_held(&(bond)->slaves_lock))
+
void bond_queue_slave_event(struct slave *slave);
void bond_lower_state_changed(struct slave *slave);
@@ -449,6 +459,46 @@ static inline void bond_hw_addr_copy(u8 *dst, const u8 *src, unsigned int len)
memcpy(dst, src, len);
}
+static inline int bond_get_slave_arr(struct bonding *bond,
+ struct net_device ***slaves,
+ int *num_slaves)
+{
+ struct net *net = dev_net(bond->dev);
+ struct list_head *iter;
+ struct slave *slave;
+ int i = 0;
+
+ mutex_lock(&bond->slaves_lock);
+
+ *slaves = kcalloc(bond->slave_cnt, sizeof(*slaves), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!(*slaves)) {
+ netif_lists_unlock(net);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
+ dev_hold(slave->dev);
+ *slaves[i++] = slave->dev;
+ }
+
+ *num_slaves = bond->slave_cnt;
+
+ mutex_unlock(&bond->slaves_lock);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline void bond_put_slave_arr(struct net_device **slaves,
+ int num_slaves)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_slaves; i++)
+ dev_put(slaves[i]);
+
+ kfree(slaves);
+}
+
#define BOND_PRI_RESELECT_ALWAYS 0
#define BOND_PRI_RESELECT_BETTER 1
#define BOND_PRI_RESELECT_FAILURE 2
--
2.25.1
More information about the dev
mailing list