[ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 4/9] ovsdb: row: Add support for xor-based row updates.
Ilya Maximets
i.maximets at ovn.org
Mon Jul 12 21:35:46 UTC 2021
On 6/19/21 8:01 PM, Mark Gray wrote:
> On 12/06/2021 03:00, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> This will be used to apply update3 type updates to ovsdb tables
>> while processing updates for future ovsdb 'relay' service model.
>>
>> 'ovsdb_datum_apply_diff' is allowed to fail, so adding support
>> to return this error.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets at ovn.org>
>> ---
>> ovsdb/execution.c | 5 +++--
>> ovsdb/replication.c | 2 +-
>> ovsdb/row.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> ovsdb/row.h | 6 ++++--
>> ovsdb/table.c | 9 +++++----
>> ovsdb/table.h | 2 +-
>> 6 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/ovsdb/execution.c b/ovsdb/execution.c
>> index 3a0dad5d0..f6150e944 100644
>> --- a/ovsdb/execution.c
>> +++ b/ovsdb/execution.c
>> @@ -483,8 +483,9 @@ update_row_cb(const struct ovsdb_row *row, void *ur_)
>>
>> ur->n_matches++;
>> if (!ovsdb_row_equal_columns(row, ur->row, ur->columns)) {
>> - ovsdb_row_update_columns(ovsdb_txn_row_modify(ur->txn, row),
>> - ur->row, ur->columns);
>> + ovsdb_error_assert(ovsdb_row_update_columns(
>> + ovsdb_txn_row_modify(ur->txn, row),
>> + ur->row, ur->columns, false));
>> }
>>
>> return true;
>> diff --git a/ovsdb/replication.c b/ovsdb/replication.c
>> index b755976b0..d8b56d813 100644
>> --- a/ovsdb/replication.c
>> +++ b/ovsdb/replication.c
>> @@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ process_table_update(struct json *table_update, const char *table_name,
>> struct ovsdb_error *error;
>> error = (!new ? ovsdb_table_execute_delete(txn, &uuid, table)
>> : !old ? ovsdb_table_execute_insert(txn, &uuid, table, new)
>> - : ovsdb_table_execute_update(txn, &uuid, table, new));
>> + : ovsdb_table_execute_update(txn, &uuid, table, new, false));
>> if (error) {
>> if (!strcmp(ovsdb_error_get_tag(error), "consistency violation")) {
>> ovsdb_error_assert(error);
>> diff --git a/ovsdb/row.c b/ovsdb/row.c
>> index 755ab91a8..65a054621 100644
>> --- a/ovsdb/row.c
>> +++ b/ovsdb/row.c
>> @@ -163,20 +163,40 @@ ovsdb_row_equal_columns(const struct ovsdb_row *a,
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> -void
>> +struct ovsdb_error *
>> ovsdb_row_update_columns(struct ovsdb_row *dst,
>> const struct ovsdb_row *src,
>> - const struct ovsdb_column_set *columns)
>> + const struct ovsdb_column_set *columns,
>> + bool xor)
>> {
>> size_t i;
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < columns->n_columns; i++) {
>> const struct ovsdb_column *column = columns->columns[i];
>> + struct ovsdb_datum xor_datum;
>> + struct ovsdb_error *error;
>> +
>> + if (xor) {
>> + error = ovsdb_datum_apply_diff(&xor_datum,
>> + &dst->fields[column->index],
>> + &src->fields[column->index],
>> + &column->type);
>> + if (error) {
>> + return error;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> ovsdb_datum_destroy(&dst->fields[column->index], &column->type);
>> - ovsdb_datum_clone(&dst->fields[column->index],
>> - &src->fields[column->index],
>> - &column->type);
>
> Could you move ovsdb_datum_destroy(&dst->fields[column->index],
> &column->type) into the "else" clause below and then merge the "if"
> clause below into the "if" clause above?
We still need to destroy for both branches, so what I can do is
something like this:
@@ -184,13 +185,11 @@ ovsdb_row_update_columns(struct ovsdb_row *dst,
if (error) {
return error;
}
- }
- ovsdb_datum_destroy(&dst->fields[column->index], &column->type);
-
- if (xor) {
+ ovsdb_datum_destroy(&dst->fields[column->index], &column->type);
ovsdb_datum_swap(&dst->fields[column->index], &xor_datum);
} else {
+ ovsdb_datum_destroy(&dst->fields[column->index], &column->type);
ovsdb_datum_clone(&dst->fields[column->index],
&src->fields[column->index],
&column->type);
---
i.e. copy the ovsdb_datum_destroy() to both branches and merge the "if"s,
but I found this harder to read.
I'll keep as is for now, but if you think that above version will be better,
I can use it.
Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
More information about the dev
mailing list