[ovs-dev] [PATCH 0/4] dpif-netdev: rxq auto-lb improvements

Kevin Traynor ktraynor at redhat.com
Fri Sep 17 08:43:21 UTC 2021


Hi Anurag,

On 17/09/2021 06:50, Anurag Agarwal wrote:
> Thanks Ilya for your email. Except for one patch, all the others are superseded by the patchset posted by Kevin. 
> 
> Outstanding patch that should be applicable is the following one: 
> 
> [ovs-dev] [PATCH 4/4] dpif-netdev: Allow cross-NUMA polling on selected ports
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2021-June/384547.html
> 
> This needs some rework to align with the patchset committed to master. 
> 
> I will get back to you on this. 
> 

Please also consider the comments related to this approach that Jan and
I discussed in the other thread. i.e. if the measured history can be a
good estimate in case of changing PMD NUMA during reassignment.

https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2021-July/385695.html

> Regards,
> Anurag
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets at ovn.org> 
> Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2021 2:53 AM
> To: anurag2k at gmail.com; dev at openvswitch.org
> Cc: Anurag Agarwal <anurag.agarwal at ericsson.com>; rudrasurya.r at acldigital.com; Anju Thomas <anju.thomas at ericsson.com>; i.maximets at ovn.org; Kevin Traynor <ktraynor at redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 0/4] dpif-netdev: rxq auto-lb improvements
> 
> On 6/29/21 13:27, anurag2k at gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Anurag Agarwal <anurag.agarwal at ericsson.com>
>>
>> =========   Disclaimer  ==============
>> This patch set was prepared and verified downstream in early 2021. A 
>> very similar set of patches with auto load balance enhancements has 
>> recently been submitted by Red Hat:
>> https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=0f466baf-50dd5293-0f462b34-86b1886cfa64-83b131dca3da994c&q=1&e=cfdc31f3-b150-4130-94a6-dc4488ef724a&u=https%3A%2F%2Fmail.openvswitch.org%2Fpipermail%2Fovs-dev%2F2021-June%2F383618.html. 
>>
>> We acknowledge the large overlap between both patch sets and submit 
>> our set of patches to underline the importance of these improvements 
>> and offer our own implementation as an alternative proposal. We are 
>> very much open to discussing the best way forward in the OVS-DPDK 
>> community to merge all improvements together in one patch set.
>> =======================================
> 
> As the other patch set got accepted, this one is no longer applicable.
> If some changes from it are still relevant, please, rebase and send a new version.
> 
> Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
> 



More information about the dev mailing list