[ovs-discuss] suspicious usage of fchmod

Jesse Gross jesse at nicira.com
Wed Apr 20 01:50:44 UTC 2011

On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Ben Pfaff <blp at nicira.com> wrote:
> With all that taken into account, here is a new version.  On Linux, I
> prefer the fchmod() based solution, because someday OVS may have to
> add support for threads and the umask is not thread-local.

Doesn't this just introduce another portability problem?  If we do
introduce threads then it will be less likely that we notice it since
things will work fine on Linux.

More information about the discuss mailing list