[ovs-discuss] Set vnet to VM or alias to vnet

Ben Pfaff blp at nicira.com
Wed Sep 19 17:32:49 UTC 2012


Can you tell me what you mean by a vnet number?  I do not know that
term.

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 09:40:41AM +0200, r po wrote:
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> Thanks Ben for you answers on the bonding. It's really helpfull.
> 
> I have another question but not on the same part. I'd like to supervise my hypervisor (which hold my VM)
> with a cacti-like. It's works fine and i see all vnet, bridge and fake-bridge associate on the hypervisor.
> 
> But there's the problems : is it possible to set a vnet number to a VM or associate an alias ?
> i explain, when i stop many VM and reboot it but not in the same order, the vnet number will change (for each VM)
> so i got to reconfigure correctly my cacti-like for specify which vnet is for which VM and so which graph is for which VM. (or i must connect to hypervisor see which vnet is for which VM, it's not pratical .. )
> 
> it's possible to do this ? or implement ?
> 
> Thank's
> 
> Aeron
> 
> > Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:18:30 -0700
> > From: blp at nicira.com
> > To: r2.d2 at live.fr
> > CC: discuss at openvswitch.org
> > Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] mode_bond balance-tcp and question
> > 
> > There is definitely a difference.  If you use balance-slb, then
> > streams from a particular host (that is, all streams, if you are not
> > using VMs) will use the same interface.  If you use balance-tcp, then
> > streams from a particular host will be spread (statistically) across
> > the available interfaces.
> > 
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 07:20:08PM +0200, r po wrote:
> > > Ok ! Tanks a lot for this quickly answer that conforte me in my config.
> > > Can you explain me if there are à real difference on balance TCP and balance slb 
> > > If the choice is mostly random ?
> > > 
> > > Thanks again !
> > > 
> > > > Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:56:32 -0700
> > > > From: blp at nicira.com
> > > > To: r2.d2 at live.fr
> > > > CC: discuss at openvswitch.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] mode_bond balance-tcp and question
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 04:35:08PM +0200, r po wrote:
> > > > > In the documentation i read, balance-tcp : balances among interface based on L2, L3 and L4 and MAC and IP.
> > > > > 
> > > > > But when i'm try to test the troughput (i used iperf) i don't up to 2Go on communication between two same IP witch two différent TCP port : 
> > > > > 
> > > > > here is my test : 
> > > > > 
> > > > > on ovs 1 : (i configured a fake bridge with IP, work well)
> > > > > 
> > > > > iperf -c 10.10.10.10 -p 1000 
> > > > > 
> > > > > (on other console but always in ovs1 )
> > > > > 
> > > > > iperf -c 10.10.10.10 -p 7000
> > > > > 
> > > > > on ovs2 (in two different console)
> > > > > 
> > > > > iperf -s -p 1000
> > > > > iperf -s -p 7000
> > > > > 
> > > > > i got about 500Mbps on each transfert.
> > > > 
> > > > The initial choice of interface for a given stream is essentially
> > > > random.  Every 10 seconds, streams get rebalanced.  If you have
> > > > exactly 2 streams, and each one lasts only a few seconds, whether you
> > > > see a benefit is a matter of luck.
> > >  		 	   		  
>  		 	   		  

> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at openvswitch.org
> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss




More information about the discuss mailing list