[ovs-discuss] OpenVswitch hardware Acceleration

Jayanthi Annadurai jayanti.a at gmail.com
Thu Apr 17 16:56:58 UTC 2014


When the hardware does not support the required action, Will the packet be
routed to root or the VM that is
owning the VF?





On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Alon Harel <alonha at mellanox.com> wrote:

> We are working on enabling OVS to handle SRIOV/VFs. This includes:
> 1. Modeling VFs as netdevs connected to an OVS bridge instance
> 2. Modeling the switch (NIC embedded switch) as a netdev
> (there is an RFC proposed by Jiri in the netdev mailing list)
> 3. Adding the forwarding hardware (NIC embedded switch) underneath the OVS
> kernel datapath.
> The concept is:
> -- Configuration is reflected to the hardware via the netdevs.
> -- Forwarding is done in hardware when actions are supported or in
> software (kernel+user) when hardware does not support the required actions
> per the flow.
>
> We will be more than happy to elaborate the discussion.
>
> Alon
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discuss [mailto:discuss-bounces at openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of
> Justin Pettit
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 3:56 AM
> To: Jayanthi Annadurai
> Cc: Wes Felter; discuss at openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OpenVswitch hardware Acceleration
>
> Jayanthi Annadurai wrote:
> > Is the support for SR-IOV on the road map for OVS?
>
> There are no plans from any discussions I've heard.
>
> --Justin
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at openvswitch.org
> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/attachments/20140417/f0071b3d/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the discuss mailing list