[ovs-discuss] coexistence of ofproto-dpif and customized ofproto provider
wuhongning at huawei.com
Wed Mar 19 04:03:23 UTC 2014
From: Ben Pfaff [blp at nicira.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 11:55 AM
Cc: discuss at openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] coexistence of ofproto-dpif and customized ofproto provider
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 03:52:42AM +0000, Wuhongning wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 01:21:53AM +0000, Wuhongning wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:41:13PM +0000, Wuhongning wrote:
>> >> >> if we have a hardware chip with rich networking feature, and want to
>> >> >> expose as a enhanced flow switch. at the same time, we also want to
>> >> >> keep the standard ovs, so what's the best practice to let them work
>> >> >> together without bother each other?
>> >> >
>> >> >Write a second ofproto provider, then configure ovs-vswitchd to use
>> >> >both.
>> >> how to "configure", can we do it on-the-fly? restart daemon process
>> >> is acceptable, but any form of re-package(compile, link...) is difficulty.
>> > It's not necessary to recompile or restart. Just create a bridge with
>> > "datapath_type" set to the name of the correct datapath provider.
>> then where shall I put the newly written ofproto module, and what's
>> the package style of it? (a .so lib, or a standalone process). we want
>> to keep all files in the ovs package distributed without any change,
>> except .ini and .conf files.
> You're talking about actually running newly written code that didn't
> exist before? I can't imagine how you'd do that without compiling or
yes we want to write new code to cope with some new flow capability
of hardware, the new ofproto surely needs to be compiled. but we don't
want to bother the original package, we only want to add something to
a running system. this is the reason why we are considering develop a
forked branch of vswitchd, and let it to run with original vswitchd concurrently.
More information about the discuss