[ovs-discuss] mf_value and mf_subvalue size restrictions

Madhu Challa challa at noironetworks.com
Wed Nov 5 18:03:52 UTC 2014


Thanks Ben. I will debug and get back to you. I will check with Jesse in
the upcoming ovs conference if he has other thoughts on implementing this.

Thanks.

On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Ben Pfaff <blp at nicira.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 03:10:59PM -0800, Madhu Challa wrote:
> > I was playing increasing the size of these structures to be able to read
> > Geneve metadata. Currently they are limited to 16 bytes. I noticed that
> > some of the test cases fail when I do this. I guess I can read the oxms
> > directly without using these structures. But figured its less error prone
> > if done this way.
>
> If we these fields to appear raw in OXMs (I think that Jesse is also
> thinking about to handle Geneve, and I don't know his thoughts on how to
> do it) then expanding these structures is probably the right way to do
> it.
>
> Have you investigated why the expansions cause failures?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/attachments/20141105/b9884eb8/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the discuss mailing list