[ovs-discuss] mf_value and mf_subvalue size restrictions

Madhu Challa challa at noironetworks.com
Thu Nov 6 19:00:41 UTC 2014

Agreed and looks good.


On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Ben Pfaff <blp at nicira.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 06:34:04PM -0800, Madhu Challa wrote:
> > The other issue was in the same file. I am glad make check catches these
> > issues and hope there are none in other files. I attached a patch that
> > should make it simpler to extend the union in the future.
> I think it's better to use ARRAY_SIZE than to invent a new macro.
> The trick with .__unused[0...15] will only work with GCC and Clang since
> the use of ... in an initializer is a GCC extension.  I think that the
> best we can do here is to add a build assertion and a comment.
> I posted my version, please take a look:
> http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2014-November/048347.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/attachments/20141106/c8a8dad5/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the discuss mailing list